From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16411 invoked by alias); 28 Nov 2012 21:41:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 16294 invoked by uid 48); 28 Nov 2012 21:40:40 -0000 From: "ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug bootstrap/54283] [4.8 regression] build tools don't run after cxx-conversion merge Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 21:41:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: bootstrap X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.8.0 X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-11/txt/msg02795.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D54283 --- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou 2012-11-28= 21:40:38 UTC --- > The general assumption on non-cross scenarios is that we're able to run a > program created by CC and CXX. If this is not the case, not even > configure-time execution tests involving the compilers would fail. This > suggests to me that we don't have a bug or even a regression here; it jus= t so > happens that we use CXX now, and CXX has never worked =E2=80=9Cproperly= =E2=80=9D on Rainer's > setting. I suggest setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH so that CXX works =E2=80=9Cpr= operly=E2=80=9D, or > using a CXX with -static-libstdc++ and whatever other options are needed = to > make newly-created executables run. -static-libstdc++ is already automatically used if supported.