From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1465 invoked by alias); 18 Dec 2012 12:06:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 1355 invoked by uid 55); 18 Dec 2012 12:06:25 -0000 From: "ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug bootstrap/54283] [4.8 regression] build tools don't run after cxx-conversion merge Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 12:06:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: bootstrap X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.8.0 X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-12/txt/msg01726.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54283 --- Comment #10 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-12-18 12:06:21 UTC --- > --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-12-18 10:30:12 UTC --- > So not a bug then? I don't think so: even on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, when building an i686-unknown-linux-gnu compiler with an unbundled gcc 4.4 (which does support -static-libstdc++) where the 32-bit libstdc++.so.6 doesn't live in /usr/lib, but only in /vol/gcc-4.4/lib, the build tools are the only ones that don't run. If it were host and build tools alike, I'd agree, but the host tools are fine, as they were before the cxx-conversion. Rainer