From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23178 invoked by alias); 16 Nov 2012 09:11:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 23082 invoked by uid 55); 16 Nov 2012 09:11:36 -0000 From: "ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug bootstrap/54283] [4.8 regression] build tools don't run after cxx-conversion merge Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 09:11:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: bootstrap X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.8.0 X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-11/txt/msg01474.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54283 --- Comment #4 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-11-16 09:11:36 UTC --- > --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski 2012-11-16 > 01:06:20 UTC --- > Does this still happen? It does. I've a local patch in my tree to allow bootstrapping at all. Unfortunately, the patch certainly isn't right, but I still can't fully wrap my head around the full consequences build/host/target distinction. Btw., I've got the same problem on i686-linux with a self-built gcc 4.4 as bootstrap compiler, so there's nothing Solaris-specific here. Rainer