From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-408113-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 22140 invoked by alias); 28 Nov 2012 19:21:37 -0000
Received: (qmail 22050 invoked by uid 48); 28 Nov 2012 19:21:18 -0000
From: "aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug bootstrap/54283] [4.8 regression] build tools don't run after cxx-conversion merge
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 19:21:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: bootstrap
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.8.0
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: CC
Message-ID: <bug-54283-4-nrm5ZscGLR@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-54283-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-54283-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-11/txt/msg02775.txt.bz2


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D54283

Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #7 from Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-11-28 =
19:21:10 UTC ---
The general assumption on non-cross scenarios is that we're able to run a
program created by CC and CXX.  If this is not the case, not even
configure-time execution tests involving the compilers would fail.  This
suggests to me that we don't have a bug or even a regression here; it just =
so
happens that we use CXX now, and CXX has never worked =E2=80=9Cproperly=E2=
=80=9D on Rainer's
setting.  I suggest setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH so that CXX works =E2=80=9Cprop=
erly=E2=80=9D, or
using a CXX with -static-libstdc++ and whatever other options are needed to
make newly-created executables run.  I'm not sure this requires a documenta=
tion
change.