public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "gregory.0xf0 at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/54300] [4.7, 4.8 Regression] regcprop incorrectly looks through parallel register swap operation Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2014 01:27:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-54300-4-ofdQlpIyb0@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-54300-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54300 gregory.0xf0 at gmail dot com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |gregory.0xf0 at gmail dot com --- Comment #19 from gregory.0xf0 at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Richard Earnshaw from comment #15) > Author: rearnsha > Date: Mon Dec 9 14:54:00 2013 > New Revision: 205807 > > URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205807&root=gcc&view=rev > Log: > PR rtl-optimization/54300 > > gcc/ > > PR rtl-optimization/54300 > * regcprop.c (copyprop_hardreg_forward_1): Ensure any unused > outputs in a single-set are killed from the value chains. > > gcc/testsuite: > > PR rtl-optimization/54300 > * gcc.target/arm/pr54300.C: New test. > > > Added: > trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/ldrd-strd-offset.c > Modified: > trunk/gcc/ChangeLog > trunk/gcc/config/arm/arm.c > trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog There probably isn't much that can be done to fix this now, but in case anyone else was confused because this change was tagged with PR 54300, it looks like this change ended up with the wrong commit message (changelog is correct). FMI: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-12/msg00850.html >From gcc-bugs-return-459439-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Aug 29 03:12:42 2014 Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-459439-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org> Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 6072 invoked by alias); 29 Aug 2014 03:12:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org> List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/> List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org> Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 6049 invoked by uid 55); 29 Aug 2014 03:12:38 -0000 From: "dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug bootstrap/62300] [5 Regression] internal compiler error: in as_a, at is-a.h:192 Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2014 03:12:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: bootstrap X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: <bug-62300-4-kRhOBTAxIH@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-62300-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-62300-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-08/txt/msg01936.txt.bz2 Content-length: 496 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?idb300 --- Comment #5 from dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: dmalcolm Date: Fri Aug 29 03:12:01 2014 New Revision: 214714 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev!4714&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR bootstrap/62300 * function.c (assign_parm_setup_reg): Remove erroneous checked cast to rtx_insn * on result of gen_extend_insn in favor of introducing a new local rtx "pat". Modified: trunk/gcc/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/function.c
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-29 1:27 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2012-08-17 15:28 [Bug target/54300] New: [4.7/4.8 Regression] Erroneous optimization causes wrong Neon data management eric.batut at allegorithmic dot com 2012-08-18 8:12 ` [Bug target/54300] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-20 16:11 ` eric.batut at allegorithmic dot com 2012-09-07 10:33 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-20 10:26 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-25 12:56 ` eric.batut at allegorithmic dot com 2012-10-25 23:03 ` steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-03 15:42 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-10 22:19 ` [Bug target/54300] [4.7 " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-11 10:42 ` eric.batut at allegorithmic dot com 2013-04-11 8:00 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-08-20 16:32 ` eric.batut at allegorithmic dot com 2013-10-04 17:29 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/54300] " rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-10-08 9:36 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/54300] [4.7, 4.8, 4.9 Regression] regcprop incorrectly looks through parallel register swap operation ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-10-08 9:47 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-10-08 10:54 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-11-20 13:55 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-12-05 9:56 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/54300] [4.7, 4.8 " steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-12-09 14:54 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-01-09 15:19 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-01-10 16:55 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-01-10 16:56 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-08-29 1:27 ` gregory.0xf0 at gmail dot com [this message]
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-54300-4-ofdQlpIyb0@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).