* [Bug other/54308] build regression in 190498 on ppc64/linux: legitimate_indirect_address_p undefined
2012-08-18 1:48 [Bug other/54308] New: build regression in 190498 on ppc64/linux: legitimate_indirect_address_p undefined PHHargrove at lbl dot gov
@ 2012-08-18 2:32 ` hp at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-08-18 2:38 ` PHHargrove at lbl dot gov
` (8 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: hp at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-08-18 2:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54308
Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |hp at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-08-18 02:32:31 UTC ---
(Note, apparent s/4.2.1/4.1.2/g in initial description.)
I'd suggest updating to just a later gcc build, if you can find *only slightly
newer* rpm:s; as for a x86_64-linux F 8 with gcc-4.1.2-33 ("gcc (GCC) 4.1.2
20070925 (Red Hat 4.1.2-33)"), I'm well into stage 1 for r190498.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug other/54308] build regression in 190498 on ppc64/linux: legitimate_indirect_address_p undefined
2012-08-18 1:48 [Bug other/54308] New: build regression in 190498 on ppc64/linux: legitimate_indirect_address_p undefined PHHargrove at lbl dot gov
2012-08-18 2:32 ` [Bug other/54308] " hp at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-08-18 2:38 ` PHHargrove at lbl dot gov
2012-08-18 3:02 ` PHHargrove at lbl dot gov
` (7 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: PHHargrove at lbl dot gov @ 2012-08-18 2:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54308
--- Comment #2 from Paul H. Hargrove <PHHargrove at lbl dot gov> 2012-08-18 02:38:21 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> (Note, apparent s/4.2.1/4.1.2/g in initial description.)
Correct, I am sorry about that.
> I'd suggest updating to just a later gcc build, if you can find *only slightly
> newer* rpm:s; as for a x86_64-linux F 8 with gcc-4.1.2-33 ("gcc (GCC) 4.1.2
> 20070925 (Red Hat 4.1.2-33)"), I'm well into stage 1 for r190498.
I already have a 4.5.1 on that system and am well past the previous failure
point by using it. I'll see how old I can go after that build is complete.
-Paul
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug other/54308] build regression in 190498 on ppc64/linux: legitimate_indirect_address_p undefined
2012-08-18 1:48 [Bug other/54308] New: build regression in 190498 on ppc64/linux: legitimate_indirect_address_p undefined PHHargrove at lbl dot gov
2012-08-18 2:32 ` [Bug other/54308] " hp at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-08-18 2:38 ` PHHargrove at lbl dot gov
@ 2012-08-18 3:02 ` PHHargrove at lbl dot gov
2012-08-18 7:27 ` [Bug other/54308] [4.8 regression] " schwab@linux-m68k.org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: PHHargrove at lbl dot gov @ 2012-08-18 3:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54308
--- Comment #3 from Paul H. Hargrove <PHHargrove at lbl dot gov> 2012-08-18 03:02:36 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> I'd suggest updating to just a later gcc build, if you can find *only slightly
> newer* rpm:s; as for a x86_64-linux F 8 with gcc-4.1.2-33 ("gcc (GCC) 4.1.2
> 20070925 (Red Hat 4.1.2-33)"), I'm well into stage 1 for r190498.
Alas use of the Fedora 8 binary RPMs is out as the libmudflap depends on the
Fedora 8 glib, and therefore would require a complete update of my system.
I am looking at the SRPMS for 4.1.2-27.fc7 and later may try 4.1.2-33 as you've
suggested.
I CAN report that building w/ GCC 4.5.1 (built from pristine gcc.gnu.org
sources) works fine.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug other/54308] [4.8 regression] build regression in 190498 on ppc64/linux: legitimate_indirect_address_p undefined
2012-08-18 1:48 [Bug other/54308] New: build regression in 190498 on ppc64/linux: legitimate_indirect_address_p undefined PHHargrove at lbl dot gov
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2012-08-18 3:02 ` PHHargrove at lbl dot gov
@ 2012-08-18 7:27 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
2012-08-18 18:40 ` [Bug target/54308] " gary at intrepid dot com
` (5 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: schwab@linux-m68k.org @ 2012-08-18 7:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54308
Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2012-08-18
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
Summary|build regression in 190498 |[4.8 regression] build
|on ppc64/linux: |regression in 190498 on
|legitimate_indirect_address |ppc64/linux:
|_p undefined |legitimate_indirect_address
| |_p undefined
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> 2012-08-18 07:26:35 UTC ---
legitimate_indirect_address_p is defined inline in rs6000.c, which has
different semantics between C and C++.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/54308] [4.8 regression] build regression in 190498 on ppc64/linux: legitimate_indirect_address_p undefined
2012-08-18 1:48 [Bug other/54308] New: build regression in 190498 on ppc64/linux: legitimate_indirect_address_p undefined PHHargrove at lbl dot gov
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2012-08-18 7:27 ` [Bug other/54308] [4.8 regression] " schwab@linux-m68k.org
@ 2012-08-18 18:40 ` gary at intrepid dot com
2012-08-18 19:05 ` PHHargrove at lbl dot gov
` (4 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: gary at intrepid dot com @ 2012-08-18 18:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54308
--- Comment #5 from Gary Funck <gary at intrepid dot com> 2012-08-18 18:39:42 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> (Note, apparent s/4.2.1/4.1.2/g in initial description.)
>
> I'd suggest updating to just a later gcc build, if you can find *only slightly
> newer* rpm:s; as for a x86_64-linux F 8 with gcc-4.1.2-33 ("gcc (GCC) 4.1.2
> 20070925 (Red Hat 4.1.2-33)"), I'm well into stage 1 for r190498.
FYI, the failing system has Redhat Release 8 (circa 2002). Fedocra Core 8
didn't come out until circa 2007. Thus, it would be surprising that an FC8 RPM
will build on the much older RH8 system.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/54308] [4.8 regression] build regression in 190498 on ppc64/linux: legitimate_indirect_address_p undefined
2012-08-18 1:48 [Bug other/54308] New: build regression in 190498 on ppc64/linux: legitimate_indirect_address_p undefined PHHargrove at lbl dot gov
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2012-08-18 18:40 ` [Bug target/54308] " gary at intrepid dot com
@ 2012-08-18 19:05 ` PHHargrove at lbl dot gov
2012-08-19 18:29 ` hp at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: PHHargrove at lbl dot gov @ 2012-08-18 19:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54308
--- Comment #6 from Paul H. Hargrove <PHHargrove at lbl dot gov> 2012-08-18 19:05:19 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5 by Gary Funck)
[...]
> FYI, the failing system has Redhat Release 8 (circa 2002). Fedocra Core 8
> didn't come out until circa 2007. Thus, it would be surprising that an FC8 RPM
> will build on the much older RH8 system.
Gary,
You are confusing my two failing systems.
This bug report is for a ppc64 system running FC6, making the F8 suggestion
reasonable.
The RH8 system is an x86 and only made it to the discuss list, not a full bug
report.
H-P,
I was unable to build 4.1.2-27.fc7 from the SRPM.
So, I've given up on finding the lowest supported compiler.
-Paul
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/54308] [4.8 regression] build regression in 190498 on ppc64/linux: legitimate_indirect_address_p undefined
2012-08-18 1:48 [Bug other/54308] New: build regression in 190498 on ppc64/linux: legitimate_indirect_address_p undefined PHHargrove at lbl dot gov
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2012-08-18 19:05 ` PHHargrove at lbl dot gov
@ 2012-08-19 18:29 ` hp at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-08-20 8:57 ` PHHargrove at lbl dot gov
` (2 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: hp at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-08-19 18:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54308
--- Comment #7 from Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-08-19 18:29:27 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> I was unable to build 4.1.2-27.fc7 from the SRPM.
I'm not sure it would have helped, seeing as the breakage was in
rs6000-specific parts.
> So, I've given up on finding the lowest supported compiler.
Ok, but see comment 4; try just removing the "inline" there. If necessary, the
inline can be wrapped in some #ifdef construct. It depends on the maintainer
to deem it acceptable of course.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/54308] [4.8 regression] build regression in 190498 on ppc64/linux: legitimate_indirect_address_p undefined
2012-08-18 1:48 [Bug other/54308] New: build regression in 190498 on ppc64/linux: legitimate_indirect_address_p undefined PHHargrove at lbl dot gov
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2012-08-19 18:29 ` hp at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-08-20 8:57 ` PHHargrove at lbl dot gov
2012-11-08 20:09 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-11-08 20:19 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: PHHargrove at lbl dot gov @ 2012-08-20 8:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54308
--- Comment #8 from Paul H. Hargrove <PHHargrove at lbl dot gov> 2012-08-20 08:57:29 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
[...]
> Ok, but see comment 4; try just removing the "inline" there. If necessary, the
> inline can be wrapped in some #ifdef construct. It depends on the maintainer
> to deem it acceptable of course.
I tried removing the "inline" keyword as suggested, from revision 190524 if it
matters.
I then attempted to build stage1 using gcc-4.1.2, just as I had originally.
I was able to build stage w/o any problems with just that 1-word change.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/54308] [4.8 regression] build regression in 190498 on ppc64/linux: legitimate_indirect_address_p undefined
2012-08-18 1:48 [Bug other/54308] New: build regression in 190498 on ppc64/linux: legitimate_indirect_address_p undefined PHHargrove at lbl dot gov
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2012-08-20 8:57 ` PHHargrove at lbl dot gov
@ 2012-11-08 20:09 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-11-08 20:19 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-11-08 20:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54308
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-11-08 20:09:20 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Nov 8 20:09:14 2012
New Revision: 193336
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193336
Log:
PR target/54308
* config/rs6000/rs6000.c (legitimate_indirect_address_p): Remove
inline keyword.
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/54308] [4.8 regression] build regression in 190498 on ppc64/linux: legitimate_indirect_address_p undefined
2012-08-18 1:48 [Bug other/54308] New: build regression in 190498 on ppc64/linux: legitimate_indirect_address_p undefined PHHargrove at lbl dot gov
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2012-11-08 20:09 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-11-08 20:19 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-11-08 20:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54308
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution| |FIXED
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-11-08 20:19:00 UTC ---
Fixed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread