From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27431 invoked by alias); 7 Dec 2012 05:14:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 26595 invoked by uid 55); 7 Dec 2012 05:13:46 -0000 From: "jason at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/54325] [4.7/4.8 Regression] C++11 uniform initialization syntax for argument-less abstract base class constructor fails Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2012 05:14:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jason at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.7.3 X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-12/txt/msg00634.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54325 --- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill 2012-12-07 05:13:42 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Fri Dec 7 05:13:33 2012 New Revision: 194290 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194290 Log: PR c++/54325 * tree.c (build_aggr_init_expr): Don't check for abstract class. Added: branches/gcc-4_7-branch/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/initlist-pure.C Modified: branches/gcc-4_7-branch/gcc/cp/ChangeLog branches/gcc-4_7-branch/gcc/cp/tree.c branches/gcc-4_7-branch/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/other/abstract3.C