From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16990 invoked by alias); 20 Nov 2012 19:09:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 15896 invoked by uid 48); 20 Nov 2012 19:08:26 -0000 From: "paolo.carlini at oracle dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/54325] [4.7/4.8 Regression] C++11 uniform initialization syntax for argument-less abstract base class constructor fails Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 19:09:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: minor X-Bugzilla-Who: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.7.3 X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-11/txt/msg01959.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54325 --- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini 2012-11-20 19:08:21 UTC --- I just tried and r175673 also rejects the reduced code in Comment #1. Let's see if I can find the exact revision where we regressed.