From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6570 invoked by alias); 21 Nov 2012 03:14:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 4478 invoked by uid 48); 21 Nov 2012 03:14:17 -0000 From: "paolo.carlini at oracle dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/54325] [4.7/4.8 Regression] C++11 uniform initialization syntax for argument-less abstract base class constructor fails Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 03:14:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.7.3 X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Severity Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-11/txt/msg01992.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54325 Paolo Carlini changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|minor |normal --- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini 2012-11-21 03:14:14 UTC --- It seems that the build_value_init calls added by r175639 have issues because it doesn't have the information that the value initialization is happening from the default constructor of a derived type.