From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19270 invoked by alias); 19 Aug 2012 20:55:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 19255 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Aug 2012 20:55:06 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.3 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 19 Aug 2012 20:54:52 +0000 From: "gary at intrepid dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug other/54326] GCC does not build with G++ version 3.4.0 Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2012 20:55:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: other X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: gary at intrepid dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-08/txt/msg01310.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D54326 --- Comment #1 from Gary Funck 2012-08-19 20:54:= 51 UTC --- Don't know if this is relevant, but a recent thread on the clang-dev list explored the differences between GCC and clang in the handling of const and constexpr. "clang vs GCC error case: both =E2=80=98const=E2=80=99 and =E2=80=98constex= pr=E2=80=99 cannot be used here" http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-dev/2012-August/023565.html