From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5669 invoked by alias); 21 Aug 2012 16:44:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 5572 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Aug 2012 16:44:55 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.3 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 16:44:42 +0000 From: "dnovillo at google dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/54332] [4.8 Regression] 481.wrf in SPEC CPU 2006 takes > 10GB memory to compile Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 16:44:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Keywords: memory-hog X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: dnovillo at google dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.8.0 X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-08/txt/msg01472.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54332 --- Comment #10 from dnovillo at google dot com 2012-08-21 16:44:10 UTC --- On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:20 PM, hjl.tools at gmail dot com wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54332 > > --- Comment #9 from H.J. Lu 2012-08-21 16:20:37 UTC --- > Revision 188059 is bad: > > f951: out of memory allocating 36872 bytes after a total of 583266304 bytes Thanks. Does rev 188129 show the same thing? The next revisions to try are: 188040 (TREE_CHECK macros) 187954 (merge from trunk) 187836 (initial VEC conversion) 187735 (merge from trunk) I now have access to SPEC2006, I'll try a build.