From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-399193-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 11147 invoked by alias); 21 Aug 2012 13:58:51 -0000
Received: (qmail 11135 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Aug 2012 13:58:49 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.3 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 13:58:36 +0000
From: "hjl.tools at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/54332] [4.8 Regression] 481.wrf in SPEC CPU 2006 takes > 10GB memory to compile
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 13:58:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: memory-hog
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: hjl.tools at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.8.0
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-54332-4-UNHq3F4NDo@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-54332-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-54332-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-08/txt/msg01465.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54332

--- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> 2012-08-21 13:58:05 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> 
> If it's related to the hash table, then comparing rev 188059 vs rev 
> 188129 may show the regression.
> 

Neither rev 188059 nor rev 188129 will build:

../../../../gcc/gcc/graphite-sese-to-poly.c: In function \u2018void
build_sese_conditions_before(dom_walk_data*, basic_block)\u2019:
../../../../gcc/gcc/graphite-sese-to-poly.c:1357:2: error: call of overloaded
\u2018VEC_safe_push_1(vec_t<gimple_statement_d*>**, NULL, const char [44], int,
const char [29])\u2019 is ambiguous
../../../../gcc/gcc/graphite-sese-to-poly.c:1357:2: note: candidates are: 
In file included from ../../../../gcc/gcc/basic-block.h:25:0,
                 from ../../../../gcc/gcc/tree-flow.h:27,
                 from ../../../../gcc/gcc/graphite-sese-to-poly.c:24:
../../../../gcc/gcc/vec.h:674:1: note: T& VEC_safe_push_1(vec_t<T>**, T, const
char*, unsigned int, const char*) [with T = gimple_statement_d*;
vec_allocation_t A = (vec_allocation_t)0u]
../../../../gcc/gcc/vec.h:682:1: note: T* VEC_safe_push_1(vec_t<T>**, const T*,
const char*, unsigned int, const char*) [with T = gimple_statement_d*;
vec_allocation_t A = (vec_allocation_t)0u]
make[2]: *** [graphite-sese-to-poly.o] Error 1
                                                              2692,40       99%