From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25532 invoked by alias); 21 Jan 2013 10:07:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 25440 invoked by uid 55); 21 Jan 2013 10:07:08 -0000 From: "ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug debug/54402] [4.8 Regression] var-tracking does not scale Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 10:07:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: debug X-Bugzilla-Keywords: compile-time-hog X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.8.0 X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2013-01/txt/msg01940.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54402 --- Comment #29 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2013-01-21 10:07:02 UTC --- > --- Comment #28 from Alexandre Oliva 2013-01-18 > 11:08:06 UTC --- > Is the mem-clobbering compile-time regression still noticeable after the recent > patch? I can't tell how the timings were before, but here's what I find for my testcase: * with -fno-var-tracking-assignments real 3:58.44 * without: real 18:52.73 which is an improvement from real 24:03.27 before. Thanks. Rainer