* [Bug target/54407] FAIL: 30_threads/condition_variable/54185.cc execution test program timed out on powerpc-apple-darwin9 and x86_64-apple-darwin10
2012-08-29 13:36 [Bug target/54407] New: FAIL: 30_threads/condition_variable/54185.cc execution test program timed out on powerpc-apple-darwin9 and x86_64-apple-darwin10 dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
@ 2012-08-30 10:42 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-08-30 12:54 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (22 subsequent siblings)
23 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-08-30 10:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54407
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-08-30 10:42:07 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> On powerpc-apple-darwin9 and x86_64-apple-darwin10, the test
> 30_threads/condition_variable/54185.cc is timed out (from
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2012-08/msg02572.html this does seem to
> occur on x86_64-apple-darwin12.2.0).
Do you mean does *not* happen on darwin12?
> Sampling the run after ~40 minutes gives:
There's no need to wait 40 mins, the process will be deadlocked after a few
milliseconds.
I can't look into this for a week, but it looks like notify_all only woke one
of the nine threads waiting on the condition variable, which would be a darwin
bug. That looks more likely if it doesn't happen on later versions.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread* [Bug target/54407] FAIL: 30_threads/condition_variable/54185.cc execution test program timed out on powerpc-apple-darwin9 and x86_64-apple-darwin10
2012-08-29 13:36 [Bug target/54407] New: FAIL: 30_threads/condition_variable/54185.cc execution test program timed out on powerpc-apple-darwin9 and x86_64-apple-darwin10 dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2012-08-30 10:42 ` [Bug target/54407] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-08-30 12:54 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2012-08-30 16:41 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
` (21 subsequent siblings)
23 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr @ 2012-08-30 12:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54407
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> 2012-08-30 12:53:54 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Do you mean does *not* happen on darwin12?
Well, I don't have access to darwin11 nor 12, so the only thing I am sure of is
that the failure does not show up in the darwin12 logs.
> ... which would be a darwin bug.
> That looks more likely if it doesn't happen on later versions.
I agree, but I doubt that apple will backport the fix. Does it exist a simple
workaround? If not, the test should be skipped for darwin before 10 (maybe 11).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread* [Bug target/54407] FAIL: 30_threads/condition_variable/54185.cc execution test program timed out on powerpc-apple-darwin9 and x86_64-apple-darwin10
2012-08-29 13:36 [Bug target/54407] New: FAIL: 30_threads/condition_variable/54185.cc execution test program timed out on powerpc-apple-darwin9 and x86_64-apple-darwin10 dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2012-08-30 10:42 ` [Bug target/54407] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-08-30 12:54 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
@ 2012-08-30 16:41 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-10-14 17:08 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (20 subsequent siblings)
23 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-08-30 16:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54407
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-08-30 16:40:48 UTC ---
I don't know of any workaround so disabling the test seems like a good option
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread* [Bug target/54407] FAIL: 30_threads/condition_variable/54185.cc execution test program timed out on powerpc-apple-darwin9 and x86_64-apple-darwin10
2012-08-29 13:36 [Bug target/54407] New: FAIL: 30_threads/condition_variable/54185.cc execution test program timed out on powerpc-apple-darwin9 and x86_64-apple-darwin10 dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2012-08-30 16:41 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-10-14 17:08 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2012-10-14 18:35 ` howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
` (19 subsequent siblings)
23 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr @ 2012-10-14 17:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54407
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> 2012-10-14 17:08:09 UTC ---
> I don't know of any workaround so disabling the test seems like a good option
What about
--- libstdc++-v3/testsuite/30_threads/condition_variable/54185.cc 2012-08-17
14:14:36.000000000 +0200
+++ ../work/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/30_threads/condition_variable/54185.cc
2012-10-14 18:52:22.000000000 +0200
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
-// { dg-do run { target *-*-freebsd* *-*-netbsd* *-*-linux* *-*-solaris*
*-*-cygwin *-*-darwin* powerpc-ibm-aix* } }
+// { dg-do run { target *-*-freebsd* *-*-netbsd* *-*-linux* *-*-solaris*
*-*-cygwin *-*-darwin1[1-9]* powerpc-ibm-aix* } }
+// { dg-do compile { target *-*-darwin[4-9]* *-*-darwin10* } }
// { dg-options " -std=gnu++0x -pthread" { target *-*-freebsd* *-*-netbsd*
*-*-linux* powerpc-ibm-aix* } }
// { dg-options " -std=gnu++0x -pthreads" { target *-*-solaris* } }
// { dg-options " -std=gnu++0x " { target *-*-cygwin *-*-darwin* } }
? Jack could you verify that the test actually run on darwin(11|12) after the
patch? TIA.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread* [Bug target/54407] FAIL: 30_threads/condition_variable/54185.cc execution test program timed out on powerpc-apple-darwin9 and x86_64-apple-darwin10
2012-08-29 13:36 [Bug target/54407] New: FAIL: 30_threads/condition_variable/54185.cc execution test program timed out on powerpc-apple-darwin9 and x86_64-apple-darwin10 dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2012-10-14 17:08 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
@ 2012-10-14 18:35 ` howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
2012-10-14 19:06 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (18 subsequent siblings)
23 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu @ 2012-10-14 18:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54407
Jack Howarth <howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |howarth at nitro dot
| |med.uc.edu
--- Comment #5 from Jack Howarth <howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu> 2012-10-14 18:35:19 UTC ---
The patch in comment 4 with...
make -k check
RUNTESTFLAGS="conformance.exp=30_threads/condition_variable/54185.cc
--target_board=unix'{-m32,-m64}'"
produces...
Native configuration is x86_64-apple-darwin11.4.2
=== libstdc++ tests ===
Schedule of variations:
unix/-m32
unix/-m64
Running target unix/-m32
Using /sw/share/dejagnu/baseboards/unix.exp as board description file for
target.
Using /sw/share/dejagnu/config/unix.exp as generic interface file for target.
Using
/sw/src/fink.build/gcc48-4.8.0-1000/gcc-4.8-20121007/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/config/default.exp
as tool-and-target-specific interface file.
Running
/sw/src/fink.build/gcc48-4.8.0-1000/gcc-4.8-20121007/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/libstdc++-dg/conformance.exp
...
=== libstdc++ Summary for unix/-m32 ===
# of expected passes 1
Running target unix/-m64
Using /sw/share/dejagnu/baseboards/unix.exp as board description file for
target.
Using /sw/share/dejagnu/config/unix.exp as generic interface file for target.
Using
/sw/src/fink.build/gcc48-4.8.0-1000/gcc-4.8-20121007/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/config/default.exp
as tool-and-target-specific interface file.
Running
/sw/src/fink.build/gcc48-4.8.0-1000/gcc-4.8-20121007/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/libstdc++-dg/conformance.exp
...
=== libstdc++ Summary for unix/-m64 ===
# of expected passes 1
=== libstdc++ Summary ===
# of expected passes 2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread* [Bug target/54407] FAIL: 30_threads/condition_variable/54185.cc execution test program timed out on powerpc-apple-darwin9 and x86_64-apple-darwin10
2012-08-29 13:36 [Bug target/54407] New: FAIL: 30_threads/condition_variable/54185.cc execution test program timed out on powerpc-apple-darwin9 and x86_64-apple-darwin10 dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2012-10-14 18:35 ` howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
@ 2012-10-14 19:06 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2012-10-14 20:14 ` howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
` (17 subsequent siblings)
23 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr @ 2012-10-14 19:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54407
--- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> 2012-10-14 19:06:32 UTC ---
> The patch in comment 4 with...
>
> make -k check
> RUNTESTFLAGS="conformance.exp=30_threads/condition_variable/54185.cc
> --target_board=unix'{-m32,-m64}'"
>
> produces...
Could you check in the log file that the test is actually run?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread* [Bug target/54407] FAIL: 30_threads/condition_variable/54185.cc execution test program timed out on powerpc-apple-darwin9 and x86_64-apple-darwin10
2012-08-29 13:36 [Bug target/54407] New: FAIL: 30_threads/condition_variable/54185.cc execution test program timed out on powerpc-apple-darwin9 and x86_64-apple-darwin10 dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2012-10-14 19:06 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
@ 2012-10-14 20:14 ` howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
2012-10-14 20:48 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (16 subsequent siblings)
23 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu @ 2012-10-14 20:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54407
--- Comment #7 from Jack Howarth <howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu> 2012-10-14 20:14:01 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> > The patch in comment 4 with...
> >
> > make -k check
> > RUNTESTFLAGS="conformance.exp=30_threads/condition_variable/54185.cc
> > --target_board=unix'{-m32,-m64}'"
> >
> > produces...
>
> Could you check in the log file that the test is actually run?
The dg-compile line oddly seems to suppress the running of the compiled test.
Dropping that line gives...
Native configuration is x86_64-apple-darwin11.4.2
=== libstdc++ tests ===
Schedule of variations:
unix/-m32
unix/-m64
Running target unix/-m32
Using /sw/share/dejagnu/baseboards/unix.exp as board description file for
target.
Using /sw/share/dejagnu/config/unix.exp as generic interface file for target.
Using
/sw/src/fink.build/gcc48-4.8.0-1000/gcc-4.8-20121007/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/config/default.exp
as tool-and-target-specific interface file.
Running
/sw/src/fink.build/gcc48-4.8.0-1000/gcc-4.8-20121007/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/libstdc++-dg/conformance.exp
...
=== libstdc++ Summary for unix/-m32 ===
# of expected passes 2
Running target unix/-m64
Using /sw/share/dejagnu/baseboards/unix.exp as board description file for
target.
Using /sw/share/dejagnu/config/unix.exp as generic interface file for target.
Using
/sw/src/fink.build/gcc48-4.8.0-1000/gcc-4.8-20121007/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/config/default.exp
as tool-and-target-specific interface file.
Running
/sw/src/fink.build/gcc48-4.8.0-1000/gcc-4.8-20121007/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/libstdc++-dg/conformance.exp
...
=== libstdc++ Summary for unix/-m64 ===
# of expected passes 2
=== libstdc++ Summary ===
# of expected passes 4
Why you want to bother to compile the test are darwins which can't safely run
it anyway. That seems rather pointless.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread* [Bug target/54407] FAIL: 30_threads/condition_variable/54185.cc execution test program timed out on powerpc-apple-darwin9 and x86_64-apple-darwin10
2012-08-29 13:36 [Bug target/54407] New: FAIL: 30_threads/condition_variable/54185.cc execution test program timed out on powerpc-apple-darwin9 and x86_64-apple-darwin10 dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2012-10-14 20:14 ` howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
@ 2012-10-14 20:48 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2012-10-14 20:54 ` howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
` (15 subsequent siblings)
23 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr @ 2012-10-14 20:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54407
--- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> 2012-10-14 20:48:21 UTC ---
> The dg-compile line oddly seems to suppress the running of the compiled test. ...
What happens if you replace the line
// { dg-do compile { target *-*-darwin[4-9]* *-*-darwin10* } }
with
// { dg-do compile { target *-*-darwin9* *-*-darwin10* } }
?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread* [Bug target/54407] FAIL: 30_threads/condition_variable/54185.cc execution test program timed out on powerpc-apple-darwin9 and x86_64-apple-darwin10
2012-08-29 13:36 [Bug target/54407] New: FAIL: 30_threads/condition_variable/54185.cc execution test program timed out on powerpc-apple-darwin9 and x86_64-apple-darwin10 dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2012-10-14 20:48 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
@ 2012-10-14 20:54 ` howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
2012-10-14 21:12 ` howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
` (14 subsequent siblings)
23 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu @ 2012-10-14 20:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54407
--- Comment #9 from Jack Howarth <howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu> 2012-10-14 20:53:56 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> > The dg-compile line oddly seems to suppress the running of the compiled test. ...
>
> What happens if you replace the line
>
> // { dg-do compile { target *-*-darwin[4-9]* *-*-darwin10* } }
>
> with
>
> // { dg-do compile { target *-*-darwin9* *-*-darwin10* } }
>
> ?
Still suppresses the execution of the test on x86_64-apple-darwin12. Are there
any examples in the FSF gcc testsuites of dg-run being used at the same time as
dg-compile? I suspect that is an unsupported combination.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread* [Bug target/54407] FAIL: 30_threads/condition_variable/54185.cc execution test program timed out on powerpc-apple-darwin9 and x86_64-apple-darwin10
2012-08-29 13:36 [Bug target/54407] New: FAIL: 30_threads/condition_variable/54185.cc execution test program timed out on powerpc-apple-darwin9 and x86_64-apple-darwin10 dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2012-10-14 20:54 ` howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
@ 2012-10-14 21:12 ` howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
2012-10-14 21:13 ` howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
` (13 subsequent siblings)
23 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu @ 2012-10-14 21:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54407
--- Comment #10 from Jack Howarth <howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu> 2012-10-14 21:12:20 UTC ---
I think you need to use...
// { dg-xfail-if "broken pthreads before darwin10" { *-*-darwin9* *-*-darwin10*
} { "*" } { "" } }
instead of dg-do-compile. From
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.1.2/gccint/Test-Directives.html,
note...
If the directive includes the optional `{ xfail selector }' and the selector is
met then the test is expected to fail. For dg-do run, execution is expected to
fail but compilation is expected to pass.
since you already are passing dg-do-run a target selector, an additional
dg-xfail-if is required. This
combination works here on x86_64-apple-darwin12....
Index: libstdc++-v3/testsuite/30_threads/condition_variable/54185.cc
===================================================================
--- libstdc++-v3/testsuite/30_threads/condition_variable/54185.cc (revision
192440)
+++ libstdc++-v3/testsuite/30_threads/condition_variable/54185.cc (working
copy)
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
-// { dg-do run { target *-*-freebsd* *-*-netbsd* *-*-linux* *-*-solaris*
*-*-cygwin *-*-darwin* powerpc-ibm-aix* } }
+// { dg-do run { target *-*-freebsd* *-*-netbsd* *-*-linux* *-*-solaris*
*-*-cygwin *-*-darwin1[1-9]* powerpc-ibm-aix* } }
+// { dg-xfail-if "broken pthreads before darwin10" { *-*-darwin9*
*-*-darwin10* } { "*" } { "" } }
// { dg-options " -std=gnu++0x -pthread" { target *-*-freebsd* *-*-netbsd*
*-*-linux* powerpc-ibm-aix* } }
// { dg-options " -std=gnu++0x -pthreads" { target *-*-solaris* } }
// { dg-options " -std=gnu++0x " { target *-*-cygwin *-*-darwin* } }
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread* [Bug target/54407] FAIL: 30_threads/condition_variable/54185.cc execution test program timed out on powerpc-apple-darwin9 and x86_64-apple-darwin10
2012-08-29 13:36 [Bug target/54407] New: FAIL: 30_threads/condition_variable/54185.cc execution test program timed out on powerpc-apple-darwin9 and x86_64-apple-darwin10 dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2012-10-14 21:12 ` howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
@ 2012-10-14 21:13 ` howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
2012-10-14 21:18 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (12 subsequent siblings)
23 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu @ 2012-10-14 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54407
--- Comment #11 from Jack Howarth <howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu> 2012-10-14 21:13:18 UTC ---
The comment should be corrected to "broken pthreads before darwin11".
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread* [Bug target/54407] FAIL: 30_threads/condition_variable/54185.cc execution test program timed out on powerpc-apple-darwin9 and x86_64-apple-darwin10
2012-08-29 13:36 [Bug target/54407] New: FAIL: 30_threads/condition_variable/54185.cc execution test program timed out on powerpc-apple-darwin9 and x86_64-apple-darwin10 dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2012-10-14 21:13 ` howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
@ 2012-10-14 21:18 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2012-10-14 21:23 ` howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
` (11 subsequent siblings)
23 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr @ 2012-10-14 21:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54407
--- Comment #12 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> 2012-10-14 21:17:47 UTC ---
> Still suppresses the execution of the test on x86_64-apple-darwin12. Are there
> any examples in the FSF gcc testsuites of dg-run being used at the same time as
> dg-compile?
Yes (I did not invent it, I tried it because I saw it):
gcc.dg/vect/vect-(82|83)_64.c for instance.
/* { dg-do run { target { { powerpc*-*-* && lp64 } && powerpc_altivec_ok } } }
*/
/* { dg-do compile { target { { powerpc*-*-* && ilp32 } && powerpc_altivec_ok }
} } */
/* { dg-options "-O2 -ftree-vectorize -mpowerpc64 -fdump-tree-vect-stats
-maltivec" } */
> I suspect that is an unsupported combination.
Now you asked the question, the test is not run on powerpc-apple-darwin9 with
-m64.
Could you try to put the 'dg-do compile' line before the 'dg-do run' one?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread* [Bug target/54407] FAIL: 30_threads/condition_variable/54185.cc execution test program timed out on powerpc-apple-darwin9 and x86_64-apple-darwin10
2012-08-29 13:36 [Bug target/54407] New: FAIL: 30_threads/condition_variable/54185.cc execution test program timed out on powerpc-apple-darwin9 and x86_64-apple-darwin10 dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2012-10-14 21:18 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
@ 2012-10-14 21:23 ` howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
2012-10-14 21:35 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (10 subsequent siblings)
23 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu @ 2012-10-14 21:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54407
--- Comment #13 from Jack Howarth <howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu> 2012-10-14 21:22:48 UTC ---
I would rather we use...
Index: libstdc++-v3/testsuite/30_threads/condition_variable/54185.cc
===================================================================
--- libstdc++-v3/testsuite/30_threads/condition_variable/54185.cc (revision
192440)
+++ libstdc++-v3/testsuite/30_threads/condition_variable/54185.cc (working
copy)
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
-// { dg-do run { target *-*-freebsd* *-*-netbsd* *-*-linux* *-*-solaris*
*-*-cygwin *-*-darwin* powerpc-ibm-aix* } }
+// { dg-do run { target *-*-freebsd* *-*-netbsd* *-*-linux* *-*-solaris*
*-*-cygwin *-*-darwin1[1-9]* powerpc-ibm-aix* } }
+// { dg-xfail-if "broken pthreads before darwin11" { *-*-darwin9*
*-*-darwin10* } { "*" } { "" } }
// { dg-options " -std=gnu++0x -pthread" { target *-*-freebsd* *-*-netbsd*
*-*-linux* powerpc-ibm-aix* } }
// { dg-options " -std=gnu++0x -pthreads" { target *-*-solaris* } }
// { dg-options " -std=gnu++0x " { target *-*-cygwin *-*-darwin* } }
The usage of dg-skip-if allows the test to be both compiled and executed on
darwin1 in concert with dg-do-run. If it is working as documented, the
dg-skip-if above to only compile on darwin9/10 but not try to execute the test
case.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread* [Bug target/54407] FAIL: 30_threads/condition_variable/54185.cc execution test program timed out on powerpc-apple-darwin9 and x86_64-apple-darwin10
2012-08-29 13:36 [Bug target/54407] New: FAIL: 30_threads/condition_variable/54185.cc execution test program timed out on powerpc-apple-darwin9 and x86_64-apple-darwin10 dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2012-10-14 21:23 ` howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
@ 2012-10-14 21:35 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2012-10-14 22:17 ` howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
` (9 subsequent siblings)
23 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr @ 2012-10-14 21:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54407
--- Comment #14 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> 2012-10-14 21:34:55 UTC ---
> > I suspect that is an unsupported combination.
>
> Now you asked the question, the test is not run on powerpc-apple-darwin9
> with -m64.
> Could you try to put the 'dg-do compile' line before the 'dg-do run' one?
This does not work either, it seems that the last dg-do is used.
Note that the test is not compiled with dg-skip-if. With dg-xfail-if as in
comment #10, test is not compiled, but as in comment #13, I get a XPASS and
the test is run.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread* [Bug target/54407] FAIL: 30_threads/condition_variable/54185.cc execution test program timed out on powerpc-apple-darwin9 and x86_64-apple-darwin10
2012-08-29 13:36 [Bug target/54407] New: FAIL: 30_threads/condition_variable/54185.cc execution test program timed out on powerpc-apple-darwin9 and x86_64-apple-darwin10 dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2012-10-14 21:35 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
@ 2012-10-14 22:17 ` howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
2012-10-16 10:07 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
23 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu @ 2012-10-14 22:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54407
--- Comment #15 from Jack Howarth <howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu> 2012-10-14 22:17:07 UTC ---
I still don't see the point of testing the compilation of a test which doesn't
execute properly. I also suspect resorting to a non-standard approach in
deja-gnu will never make it pass the review process.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread* [Bug target/54407] FAIL: 30_threads/condition_variable/54185.cc execution test program timed out on powerpc-apple-darwin9 and x86_64-apple-darwin10
2012-08-29 13:36 [Bug target/54407] New: FAIL: 30_threads/condition_variable/54185.cc execution test program timed out on powerpc-apple-darwin9 and x86_64-apple-darwin10 dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2012-10-14 22:17 ` howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
@ 2012-10-16 10:07 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-03-10 17:58 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (7 subsequent siblings)
23 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-10-16 10:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54407
--- Comment #16 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-10-16 10:07:31 UTC ---
Agreed, please just disable the test entirely on the targets where it fails
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread* [Bug target/54407] FAIL: 30_threads/condition_variable/54185.cc execution test program timed out on powerpc-apple-darwin9 and x86_64-apple-darwin10
2012-08-29 13:36 [Bug target/54407] New: FAIL: 30_threads/condition_variable/54185.cc execution test program timed out on powerpc-apple-darwin9 and x86_64-apple-darwin10 dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (15 preceding siblings ...)
2012-10-16 10:07 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-03-10 17:58 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2013-03-11 14:51 ` howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
` (6 subsequent siblings)
23 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr @ 2013-03-10 17:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54407
--- Comment #17 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> 2013-03-10 17:58:17 UTC ---
Jack,
I see at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2012-11/msg00331.html that you
have tested a fix for this PR. I have tested that it skips the test on
powerpc-apple-darwin9 and x86_64-apple-darwin10. Have you submitted it?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread* [Bug target/54407] FAIL: 30_threads/condition_variable/54185.cc execution test program timed out on powerpc-apple-darwin9 and x86_64-apple-darwin10
2012-08-29 13:36 [Bug target/54407] New: FAIL: 30_threads/condition_variable/54185.cc execution test program timed out on powerpc-apple-darwin9 and x86_64-apple-darwin10 dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (16 preceding siblings ...)
2013-03-10 17:58 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
@ 2013-03-11 14:51 ` howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
2013-06-29 15:47 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (5 subsequent siblings)
23 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu @ 2013-03-11 14:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54407
--- Comment #18 from Jack Howarth <howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu> 2013-03-11 14:51:01 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #17)
> Jack,
>
> I see at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2012-11/msg00331.html that you
> have tested a fix for this PR. I have tested that it skips the test on
> powerpc-apple-darwin9 and x86_64-apple-darwin10. Have you submitted it?
I posted this patch back in Oct as...
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2012-10/msg00111.html
Mike wanted a comment about an associated radar which doesn't exist. As far as
I know this bug was fixed in the pthread rewrites for darwin11 and later.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread* [Bug target/54407] FAIL: 30_threads/condition_variable/54185.cc execution test program timed out on powerpc-apple-darwin9 and x86_64-apple-darwin10
2012-08-29 13:36 [Bug target/54407] New: FAIL: 30_threads/condition_variable/54185.cc execution test program timed out on powerpc-apple-darwin9 and x86_64-apple-darwin10 dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (17 preceding siblings ...)
2013-03-11 14:51 ` howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
@ 2013-06-29 15:47 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2013-06-29 20:29 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
` (4 subsequent siblings)
23 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr @ 2013-06-29 15:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54407
Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2013-06-29
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #19 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
> I posted this patch back in Oct as...
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2012-10/msg00111.html
>
> Mike wanted a comment about an associated radar which doesn't exist.
> As far as I know this bug was fixed in the pthread rewrites for darwin11
> and later.
Could someone commit the patch?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread* [Bug target/54407] FAIL: 30_threads/condition_variable/54185.cc execution test program timed out on powerpc-apple-darwin9 and x86_64-apple-darwin10
2012-08-29 13:36 [Bug target/54407] New: FAIL: 30_threads/condition_variable/54185.cc execution test program timed out on powerpc-apple-darwin9 and x86_64-apple-darwin10 dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (18 preceding siblings ...)
2013-06-29 15:47 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
@ 2013-06-29 20:29 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2014-04-02 8:45 ` dominiq at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
23 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com @ 2013-06-29 20:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54407
--- Comment #20 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> ---
Commit *what*? Please add a link to something actually OKed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread* [Bug target/54407] FAIL: 30_threads/condition_variable/54185.cc execution test program timed out on powerpc-apple-darwin9 and x86_64-apple-darwin10
2012-08-29 13:36 [Bug target/54407] New: FAIL: 30_threads/condition_variable/54185.cc execution test program timed out on powerpc-apple-darwin9 and x86_64-apple-darwin10 dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (19 preceding siblings ...)
2013-06-29 20:29 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
@ 2014-04-02 8:45 ` dominiq at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-04-05 12:26 ` dominiq at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
23 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-04-02 8:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54407
--- Comment #21 from dominiq at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: dominiq
Date: Wed Apr 2 08:44:40 2014
New Revision: 209017
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209017&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-04-02 Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq@lps.ens.fr>
Jack Howarth <howarth@bromo.med.uc.edu>
PR target/54407
* testsuite/30_threads/condition_variable/54185.cc: Skip for
darwin < 11.
Modified:
trunk/libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog
trunk/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/30_threads/condition_variable/54185.cc
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread* [Bug target/54407] FAIL: 30_threads/condition_variable/54185.cc execution test program timed out on powerpc-apple-darwin9 and x86_64-apple-darwin10
2012-08-29 13:36 [Bug target/54407] New: FAIL: 30_threads/condition_variable/54185.cc execution test program timed out on powerpc-apple-darwin9 and x86_64-apple-darwin10 dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (20 preceding siblings ...)
2014-04-02 8:45 ` dominiq at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-04-05 12:26 ` dominiq at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-04-05 12:30 ` dominiq at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-04-05 12:33 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
23 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-04-05 12:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54407
--- Comment #22 from dominiq at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: dominiq
Date: Sat Apr 5 12:25:37 2014
New Revision: 209152
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209152&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2012-04-06 Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq@lps.ens.fr>
Jack Howarth <howarth@bromo.med.uc.edu>
PR target/54407
* 30_threads/condition_variable/54185.cc: Skip for darwin < 11.
Modified:
branches/gcc-4_8-branch/libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_8-branch/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/30_threads/condition_variable/54185.cc
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread* [Bug target/54407] FAIL: 30_threads/condition_variable/54185.cc execution test program timed out on powerpc-apple-darwin9 and x86_64-apple-darwin10
2012-08-29 13:36 [Bug target/54407] New: FAIL: 30_threads/condition_variable/54185.cc execution test program timed out on powerpc-apple-darwin9 and x86_64-apple-darwin10 dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (21 preceding siblings ...)
2014-04-05 12:26 ` dominiq at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-04-05 12:30 ` dominiq at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-04-05 12:33 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
23 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-04-05 12:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54407
--- Comment #23 from dominiq at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: dominiq
Date: Sat Apr 5 12:29:27 2014
New Revision: 209153
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209153&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2012-04-05 Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq@lps.ens.fr>
Jack Howarth <howarth@bromo.med.uc.edu>
PR target/54407
* 30_threads/condition_variable/54185.cc: Skip for darwin < 11.
Modified:
branches/gcc-4_7-branch/libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_7-branch/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/30_threads/condition_variable/54185.cc
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread* [Bug target/54407] FAIL: 30_threads/condition_variable/54185.cc execution test program timed out on powerpc-apple-darwin9 and x86_64-apple-darwin10
2012-08-29 13:36 [Bug target/54407] New: FAIL: 30_threads/condition_variable/54185.cc execution test program timed out on powerpc-apple-darwin9 and x86_64-apple-darwin10 dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (22 preceding siblings ...)
2014-04-05 12:30 ` dominiq at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-04-05 12:33 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
23 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr @ 2014-04-05 12:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54407
Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #24 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
Finally fixed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread