public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/54455] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE: RTL check: expected elt 3 type 'B', have '0' (rtx barrier) in compute_bb_for_insn, at cfgrtl.c:418
Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2012 08:29:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-54455-4-XbPgCRICMY@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-54455-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54455

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-09-03 08:29:10 UTC ---
As for 1), I haven't added the testcase because I partially agree with Eric
Botcazou on that scheduling just shouldn't be enabled for -O0, and in that case
the testcase would immediately stop testing this issue.  For 2), perhaps, but
not sure what other spots would use that helper, while e.g. one spot in
cfgrtl.c has similar code, it doesn't have the same code, it tests for two bbs,
not just one, and has different behavior based on which one of them it is.
Sure, if you have time and can take over testing this, go ahead.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-09-03  8:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-02 10:04 [Bug rtl-optimization/54455] New: " zsojka at seznam dot cz
2012-09-02 10:49 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/54455] " ubizjak at gmail dot com
2012-09-02 11:25 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2012-09-02 11:47 ` steven at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-09-02 12:11 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2012-09-02 12:28 ` steven at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-09-02 12:44 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2012-09-02 14:58 ` steven at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-09-02 15:15 ` steven at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-09-03  8:04 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-09-03  8:21 ` abel at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-09-03  8:29 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2012-09-03 10:17 ` zsojka at seznam dot cz
2012-09-03 17:45 ` zsojka at seznam dot cz
2012-09-06  7:29 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-09-06  7:36 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/54455] [4.7 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-09-07  9:35 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-09-07  9:36 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-09-07  9:36 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-54455-4-XbPgCRICMY@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).