From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-399973-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 2833 invoked by alias); 3 Sep 2012 09:02:48 -0000
Received: (qmail 2815 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Sep 2012 09:02:46 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.3 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 Sep 2012 09:02:34 +0000
From: "burnus at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/54462] [4.8 Regression] Another "segmentation fault" after an error in COMMON statement after r190853
Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2012 09:02:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: CC
Message-ID: <bug-54462-4-VX2MJnyU3Y@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-54462-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-54462-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-09/txt/msg00139.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54462

Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |burnus at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-09-03 09:01:55 UTC ---
Rather obvious but untested draft patch:

--- a/gcc/fortran/symbol.c
+++ b/gcc/fortran/symbol.c
@@ -2922,4 +2922,6 @@ gfc_undo_symbols (void)
-
-                 st.name = st0->name;
-                 gfc_delete_bbt (&p->ns->common_root, &st, compare_symtree);
-                 free (st0);
+                 if (st0)
+                   {
+                     st.name = st0->name;
+                     gfc_delete_bbt (&p->ns->common_root, &st,
compare_symtree);
+                     free (st0);
+                   }