public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/54462] New: [4.8 Regression] Another "segmentation fault" after an error in COMMON statement after r190853
@ 2012-09-02 19:37 dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2012-09-03 9:02 ` [Bug fortran/54462] " burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr @ 2012-09-02 19:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54462
Bug #: 54462
Summary: [4.8 Regression] Another "segmentation fault" after an
error in COMMON statement after r190853
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: dominiq@lps.ens.fr
CC: burnus@net-b.de
After revision 190853 compiling the original test in pr29537 gives a
segmentation fault. A reduced test is
type a_t
integer i
end type a_t
block data bd
common c
end block data bd
common /a_t/ c
end
and the backtrace is
(gdb) run pr29537_red.f90
Starting program:
/opt/gcc/gcc4.8p-190863p3/libexec/gcc/x86_64-apple-darwin10.8.0/4.8.0/f951
pr29537_red.f90
pr29537_red.f90:5.13:
block data bd
1
Error: Unexpected BLOCK DATA statement at (1)
pr29537_red.f90:6.10:
common c
1
Error: Unexpected COMMON statement at (1)
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
gfc_undo_symbols () at ../../p_work/gcc/fortran/symbol.c:2923
2923 st.name = st0->name;
(gdb) bt
#0 gfc_undo_symbols () at ../../p_work/gcc/fortran/symbol.c:2923
#1 0x0000000100077fa6 in reject_statement () at
../../p_work/gcc/fortran/parse.c:1747
#2 0x000000010007e226 in parse_progunit (st=<optimized out>) at
../../p_work/gcc/fortran/parse.c:4168
#3 0x000000010007f04f in gfc_parse_file () at
../../p_work/gcc/fortran/parse.c:4597
#4 0x00000001000be5c6 in gfc_be_parse_file () at
../../p_work/gcc/fortran/f95-lang.c:191
#5 0x000000010061e95f in compile_file () at ../../p_work/gcc/toplev.c:546
#6 0x0000000100620425 in toplev_main (argc=2, argv=0x7fff5fbfd778) at
../../p_work/gcc/toplev.c:1863
#7 0x000000010000aa44 in start () at
../../../p_work/libgcc/unwind-dw2-fde.c:1055
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/54462] [4.8 Regression] Another "segmentation fault" after an error in COMMON statement after r190853
2012-09-02 19:37 [Bug fortran/54462] New: [4.8 Regression] Another "segmentation fault" after an error in COMMON statement after r190853 dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
@ 2012-09-03 9:02 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-09-05 11:47 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-09-03 9:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54462
Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-09-03 09:01:55 UTC ---
Rather obvious but untested draft patch:
--- a/gcc/fortran/symbol.c
+++ b/gcc/fortran/symbol.c
@@ -2922,4 +2922,6 @@ gfc_undo_symbols (void)
-
- st.name = st0->name;
- gfc_delete_bbt (&p->ns->common_root, &st, compare_symtree);
- free (st0);
+ if (st0)
+ {
+ st.name = st0->name;
+ gfc_delete_bbt (&p->ns->common_root, &st,
compare_symtree);
+ free (st0);
+ }
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/54462] [4.8 Regression] Another "segmentation fault" after an error in COMMON statement after r190853
2012-09-02 19:37 [Bug fortran/54462] New: [4.8 Regression] Another "segmentation fault" after an error in COMMON statement after r190853 dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2012-09-03 9:02 ` [Bug fortran/54462] " burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-09-05 11:47 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2012-09-05 16:41 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-09-05 17:01 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr @ 2012-09-05 11:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54462
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> 2012-09-05 11:46:24 UTC ---
Indeed the patch in comment #1 fixes the PR without regression.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/54462] [4.8 Regression] Another "segmentation fault" after an error in COMMON statement after r190853
2012-09-02 19:37 [Bug fortran/54462] New: [4.8 Regression] Another "segmentation fault" after an error in COMMON statement after r190853 dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2012-09-03 9:02 ` [Bug fortran/54462] " burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-09-05 11:47 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
@ 2012-09-05 16:41 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-09-05 17:01 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-09-05 16:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54462
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-09-05 16:40:56 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Wed Sep 5 16:40:48 2012
New Revision: 190989
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190989
Log:
2012-09-05 Tobias Burnus <burnus@net-b.de>
PR fortran/54462
* symbol.c (gfc_undo_symbols): Avoid NULL pointer dereference.
Modified:
trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/fortran/symbol.c
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/54462] [4.8 Regression] Another "segmentation fault" after an error in COMMON statement after r190853
2012-09-02 19:37 [Bug fortran/54462] New: [4.8 Regression] Another "segmentation fault" after an error in COMMON statement after r190853 dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2012-09-05 16:41 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-09-05 17:01 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-09-05 17:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54462
Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-09-05 17:00:48 UTC ---
FIXED. Dominique, thanks for the bugreport and testing the patch!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-09-05 17:01 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-09-02 19:37 [Bug fortran/54462] New: [4.8 Regression] Another "segmentation fault" after an error in COMMON statement after r190853 dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2012-09-03 9:02 ` [Bug fortran/54462] " burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-09-05 11:47 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2012-09-05 16:41 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-09-05 17:01 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).