From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27514 invoked by alias); 7 Sep 2012 20:38:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 27504 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Sep 2012 20:38:26 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.6 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 Sep 2012 20:38:13 +0000 From: "tsoae at mail dot ru" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/54521] New: g++ fails to call explicit constructors in the second step of copy initialization Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 20:38:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: tsoae at mail dot ru X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-09/txt/msg00649.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54521 Bug #: 54521 Summary: g++ fails to call explicit constructors in the second step of copy initialization Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: tsoae@mail.ru g++ fails to compile the following code struct X { X(int) {} explicit X(X const &) {} }; int main() { X x = 1; // error: no matching function for call to 'X::X(X)' } The second step of a copy initialization (see 8.5/16/6/2) is a direct-initialization where explicit constructors shall be considered as candidate functions.