public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug rtl-optimization/54524] New: Spurious add on sum of bitshifts @ 2012-09-08 9:28 jan.smets@alcatel-lucent.com 2012-09-08 13:19 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/54524] " jan.smets@alcatel-lucent.com ` (12 more replies) 0 siblings, 13 replies; 14+ messages in thread From: jan.smets@alcatel-lucent.com @ 2012-09-08 9:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54524 Bug #: 54524 Summary: Spurious add on sum of bitshifts Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: rtl-optimization AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: jan.smets@alcatel-lucent.com There is an spurious addiu a2,a2,1 which causes the result to be incorrect. tUint32 is unsigned long long MIPS O32 GCC 4.6.3 -nostdinc -funsigned-char -fno-builtin -march=mips2 -G 0 -mno-gpopt -msoft-float -fno-merge-constants -pipe -Wall -O2 -fno-optimize-sibling-calls -fno-partial-inlining -fno-reorder-blocks -fno-strict-aliasing PUBLIC void function( tUint32 index160, tUint8 * data) { tUint8 temp_data[160/8]; tUint32 scrambled_address; *(tUint64*)(temp_data+8) = *(tUint64*)(data+8); scrambled_address = index160; printf("%16llX.\n", 0x4000000000400000ull + (((tUint64)*(tUint16*)(temp_data+12)) << 24) + ((tUint64)(scrambled_address & 0xFF) << 56)); } 0x364c70c 27bdffd0 addiu sp,sp,-48 0x364c710 afbf002c sw ra,44(sp) 0x364c714 8ca8000c lw t0,12(a1) t0 = pp qq rr ss 0x364c718 3c030040 lui v1,0x40 v1 = 00 40 00 00 0x364c71c 3c024000 lui v0,0x4000 v0 = 40 00 00 00 0x364c720 00085402 srl t2,t0,16 t2 = 00 00 pp qq 0x364c724 000a4e00 sll t1,t2,24 t1 = qq 00 00 00 0x364c728 01233821 addu a3,t1,v1 a3 = qq 40 00 00 0x364c72c 000a5202 srl t2,t2,8 t2 = 00 00 00 pp 0x364c730 00e9482b sltu t1,a3,t1 t1 = carry? 0x364c734 01421021 addu v0,t2,v0 v0 = 40 00 00 pp 0x364c738 00042600 sll a0,a0,24 a0 = index160 << 24 0x364c73c 8ca30008 lw v1,8(a1) 0x364c740 01221021 addu v0,t1,v0 v0 += carry 0x364c744 00443021 addu a2,v0,a0 a2 = v0 + index160 << 24 0x364c748 3c04066e lui a0,0x66e \_ String address 0x364c74c 24842084 addiu a0,a0,8324 / 0x364c750 24c60001 addiu a2,a2,1 - Spurious add 0x364c754 afa30018 sw v1,24(sp) 0x364c758 0cb402e1 jal printf - Takes a0 = string. a1 = low word, a2 = high word 0x364c75c afa8001c sw t0,28(sp) 0x364c760 8fbf002c lw ra,44(sp) 0x364c764 8fe00000 lw zero,0(ra) (internal extension) 0x364c768 03e00008 jr ra 0x364c76c 27bd0030 addiu sp,sp,48 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/54524] Spurious add on sum of bitshifts 2012-09-08 9:28 [Bug rtl-optimization/54524] New: Spurious add on sum of bitshifts jan.smets@alcatel-lucent.com @ 2012-09-08 13:19 ` jan.smets@alcatel-lucent.com 2012-09-18 8:22 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/54524] Spurious add on sum of bitshifts (forward-propagate issue) jan.smets@alcatel-lucent.com ` (11 subsequent siblings) 12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread From: jan.smets@alcatel-lucent.com @ 2012-09-08 13:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54524 --- Comment #1 from Jan Smets <jan.smets@alcatel-lucent.com> 2012-09-08 13:18:48 UTC --- Created attachment 28152 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28152 testcase The result is correct with -fno-forward-propagate tUint64 is unsigned long long I meant. An even more reduced testcase is attached. Compile it with a MIPS cross compiler: ./gcc -nostdinc -funsigned-char -fno-builtin -G 0 -mno-gpopt -msoft-float -fno-merge-constants -pipe -Wall -O2 -fno-optimize-sibling-calls -fno-partial-inlining -fno-reorder-blocks -fno-strict-aliasing -c /tmp/test.c -o test -mabi=32 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/54524] Spurious add on sum of bitshifts (forward-propagate issue) 2012-09-08 9:28 [Bug rtl-optimization/54524] New: Spurious add on sum of bitshifts jan.smets@alcatel-lucent.com 2012-09-08 13:19 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/54524] " jan.smets@alcatel-lucent.com @ 2012-09-18 8:22 ` jan.smets@alcatel-lucent.com 2012-09-18 12:42 ` jan.smets@alcatel-lucent.com ` (10 subsequent siblings) 12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread From: jan.smets@alcatel-lucent.com @ 2012-09-18 8:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54524 Jan Smets <jan.smets@alcatel-lucent.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |major ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/54524] Spurious add on sum of bitshifts (forward-propagate issue) 2012-09-08 9:28 [Bug rtl-optimization/54524] New: Spurious add on sum of bitshifts jan.smets@alcatel-lucent.com 2012-09-08 13:19 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/54524] " jan.smets@alcatel-lucent.com 2012-09-18 8:22 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/54524] Spurious add on sum of bitshifts (forward-propagate issue) jan.smets@alcatel-lucent.com @ 2012-09-18 12:42 ` jan.smets@alcatel-lucent.com 2012-09-18 13:06 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/54524] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ` (9 subsequent siblings) 12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread From: jan.smets@alcatel-lucent.com @ 2012-09-18 12:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54524 Jan Smets <jan.smets@alcatel-lucent.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target|mips |mipsisa64-octeon-elf Known to work| |4.5.0, 4.5.4 Known to fail| |4.6.0, 4.6.3, 4.7.1, 4.8.0 --- Comment #2 from Jan Smets <jan.smets@alcatel-lucent.com> 2012-09-18 12:41:43 UTC --- GCC 4.5.4 => CORRECT ==================== 0: 27bdffd0 addiu sp,sp,-48 4: 97a5001c lhu a1,28(sp) 8: 000427c0 sll a0,a0,0x1f c: 00053600 sll a2,a1,0x18 10: 3c030040 lui v1,0x40 14: 00052a02 srl a1,a1,0x8 18: 00a42821 addu a1,a1,a0 1c: 00c33821 addu a3,a2,v1 20: 3c024000 lui v0,0x4000 24: 00e6302b sltu a2,a3,a2 28: 00a21021 addu v0,a1,v0 2c: 3c040000 lui a0,0x0 2c: R_MIPS_HI16 .rodata 30: 24840000 addiu a0,a0,0 30: R_MIPS_LO16 .rodata 34: afbf002c sw ra,44(sp) 38: 0c000000 jal 0 <function> 38: R_MIPS_26 printf 3c: 00c23021 addu a2,a2,v0 <= ! 40: 8fbf002c lw ra,44(sp) 44: 03e00008 jr ra 48: 27bd0030 addiu sp,sp,48 GCC 4.6.3 ========= 0: 27bdffd0 addiu sp,sp,-48 4: 97a5001c lhu a1,28(sp) 8: 3c030040 lui v1,0x40 c: 3c024000 lui v0,0x4000 10: 00054600 sll t0,a1,0x18 14: 01033821 addu a3,t0,v1 18: 00052a02 srl a1,a1,0x8 1c: 00e8402b sltu t0,a3,t0 20: 00a21021 addu v0,a1,v0 24: 000427c0 sll a0,a0,0x1f 28: 01023021 addu a2,t0,v0 2c: 00c43021 addu a2,a2,a0 30: 3c040000 lui a0,0x0 30: R_MIPS_HI16 .rodata 34: 24840000 addiu a0,a0,0 34: R_MIPS_LO16 .rodata 38: afbf002c sw ra,44(sp) 3c: 0c000000 jal 0 <function> 3c: R_MIPS_26 printf 40: 24c60001 addiu a2,a2,1 <= ! 44: 8fbf002c lw ra,44(sp) 48: 03e00008 jr ra 4c: 27bd0030 addiu sp,sp,48 GCC 4.8.0 ========= 0: 27bdffd0 addiu sp,sp,-48 4: 97a6001c lhu a2,28(sp) 8: 3c030040 lui v1,0x40 c: 00062e00 sll a1,a2,0x18 10: 00a33821 addu a3,a1,v1 14: 00063202 srl a2,a2,0x8 18: 3c024000 lui v0,0x4000 1c: 00e5282b sltu a1,a3,a1 20: 00c21021 addu v0,a2,v0 24: 000427c0 sll a0,a0,0x1f 28: 00a21021 addu v0,a1,v0 2c: 00443021 addu a2,v0,a0 30: 3c040000 lui a0,0x0 30: R_MIPS_HI16 .rodata 34: 24840000 addiu a0,a0,0 34: R_MIPS_LO16 .rodata 38: afbf002c sw ra,44(sp) 3c: 0c000000 jal 0 <function> 3c: R_MIPS_26 printf 40: 24c60001 addiu a2,a2,1 <= ! 44: 8fbf002c lw ra,44(sp) 48: 03e00008 jr ra 4c: 27bd0030 addiu sp,sp,48 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/54524] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Spurious add on sum of bitshifts (forward-propagate issue) 2012-09-08 9:28 [Bug rtl-optimization/54524] New: Spurious add on sum of bitshifts jan.smets@alcatel-lucent.com ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2012-09-18 12:42 ` jan.smets@alcatel-lucent.com @ 2012-09-18 13:06 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-18 21:49 ` jan.smets@alcatel-lucent.com ` (8 subsequent siblings) 12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-09-18 13:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54524 Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|--- |4.6.4 Summary|Spurious add on sum of |[4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] |bitshifts |Spurious add on sum of |(forward-propagate issue) |bitshifts | |(forward-propagate issue) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/54524] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Spurious add on sum of bitshifts (forward-propagate issue) 2012-09-08 9:28 [Bug rtl-optimization/54524] New: Spurious add on sum of bitshifts jan.smets@alcatel-lucent.com ` (3 preceding siblings ...) 2012-09-18 13:06 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/54524] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-09-18 21:49 ` jan.smets@alcatel-lucent.com 2012-09-19 1:39 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ` (7 subsequent siblings) 12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread From: jan.smets@alcatel-lucent.com @ 2012-09-18 21:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54524 --- Comment #3 from Jan Smets <jan.smets@alcatel-lucent.com> 2012-09-18 21:49:21 UTC --- This commit introduced the bug: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revision&revision=161655 (or 182cf5a9a415f31df0f9a10e46faed1221484a35 in git) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/54524] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Spurious add on sum of bitshifts (forward-propagate issue) 2012-09-08 9:28 [Bug rtl-optimization/54524] New: Spurious add on sum of bitshifts jan.smets@alcatel-lucent.com ` (4 preceding siblings ...) 2012-09-18 21:49 ` jan.smets@alcatel-lucent.com @ 2012-09-19 1:39 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-19 8:46 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ` (6 subsequent siblings) 12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-09-19 1:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54524 Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed| |2012-09-19 Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Severity|major |normal --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-09-19 01:39:38 UTC --- As far as I can tell, Richard's patch just exposed a latent bug as I was looking into the dumps. In insn 28, replacing (ltu:SI (reg:SI 231 [+4 ]) (reg:SI 229 [+4 ])) with (const_int 1 [0x1]) Changed insn 28 deferring rescan insn with uid = 28. after cse: (insn 27 43 28 2 (set (reg:SI 231 [+4 ]) (plus:SI (reg:SI 229 [+4 ]) (const_int 0 [0]))) t.c:24 10 {*addsi3} (nil)) (insn 28 27 29 2 (set (reg:SI 212) (ltu:SI (reg:SI 231 [+4 ]) (reg:SI 229 [+4 ]))) t.c:24 521 {*sltu_sisi} (nil)) So this is a bug in CSE which is not simplifying that addsi3 into just a move for some reason. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/54524] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Spurious add on sum of bitshifts (forward-propagate issue) 2012-09-08 9:28 [Bug rtl-optimization/54524] New: Spurious add on sum of bitshifts jan.smets@alcatel-lucent.com ` (5 preceding siblings ...) 2012-09-19 1:39 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-09-19 8:46 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-22 22:26 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ` (5 subsequent siblings) 12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-09-19 8:46 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54524 --- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-09-19 08:46:37 UTC --- Still non-canonical RTL should not result in wrong-code. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/54524] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Spurious add on sum of bitshifts (forward-propagate issue) 2012-09-08 9:28 [Bug rtl-optimization/54524] New: Spurious add on sum of bitshifts jan.smets@alcatel-lucent.com ` (6 preceding siblings ...) 2012-09-19 8:46 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-09-22 22:26 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-02 23:33 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ` (4 subsequent siblings) 12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-09-22 22:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54524 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-09-22 22:26:37 UTC --- I think this code: /* (LTU/GEU (PLUS a C) C), where C is constant, can be simplified to (GEU/LTU a -C). Likewise for (LTU/GEU (PLUS a C) a). */ Is what is causing the issue as that is only true if C is non-zero. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/54524] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Spurious add on sum of bitshifts (forward-propagate issue) 2012-09-08 9:28 [Bug rtl-optimization/54524] New: Spurious add on sum of bitshifts jan.smets@alcatel-lucent.com ` (7 preceding siblings ...) 2012-09-22 22:26 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-11-02 23:33 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-02 23:34 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/54524] [4.6/4.7 " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ` (3 subsequent siblings) 12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-11-02 23:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54524 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-11-02 23:32:38 UTC --- Author: pinskia Date: Fri Nov 2 23:32:32 2012 New Revision: 193111 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193111 Log: 2012-11-02 Andrew Pinski <apinski@cavium.com> PR rtl-opt/54524 * simplify-rtx.c (simplify_relational_operation_1): Don't simplify (LTU/GEU (PLUS a 0) 0) into (GEU/LTU a 0) since they are not equivalent. Modified: trunk/gcc/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/simplify-rtx.c ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/54524] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Spurious add on sum of bitshifts (forward-propagate issue) 2012-09-08 9:28 [Bug rtl-optimization/54524] New: Spurious add on sum of bitshifts jan.smets@alcatel-lucent.com ` (8 preceding siblings ...) 2012-11-02 23:33 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-11-02 23:34 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-03 18:25 ` jan.smets@alcatel-lucent.com ` (2 subsequent siblings) 12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-11-02 23:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54524 Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Known to work| |4.8.0 Summary|[4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] |[4.6/4.7 Regression] |Spurious add on sum of |Spurious add on sum of |bitshifts |bitshifts |(forward-propagate issue) |(forward-propagate issue) Known to fail|4.8.0 | --- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-11-02 23:33:46 UTC --- Fixed on the trunk. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/54524] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Spurious add on sum of bitshifts (forward-propagate issue) 2012-09-08 9:28 [Bug rtl-optimization/54524] New: Spurious add on sum of bitshifts jan.smets@alcatel-lucent.com ` (9 preceding siblings ...) 2012-11-02 23:34 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/54524] [4.6/4.7 " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-11-03 18:25 ` jan.smets@alcatel-lucent.com 2012-12-03 15:43 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-07 13:31 ` jan.smets@alcatel-lucent.com 12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread From: jan.smets@alcatel-lucent.com @ 2012-11-03 18:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54524 --- Comment #9 from Jan Smets <jan.smets@alcatel-lucent.com> 2012-11-03 18:25:32 UTC --- Verified. Thanks Andrew. (Should I mark it as Resolved?) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/54524] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Spurious add on sum of bitshifts (forward-propagate issue) 2012-09-08 9:28 [Bug rtl-optimization/54524] New: Spurious add on sum of bitshifts jan.smets@alcatel-lucent.com ` (10 preceding siblings ...) 2012-11-03 18:25 ` jan.smets@alcatel-lucent.com @ 2012-12-03 15:43 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-07 13:31 ` jan.smets@alcatel-lucent.com 12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-12-03 15:43 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54524 Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|P3 |P2 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/54524] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Spurious add on sum of bitshifts (forward-propagate issue) 2012-09-08 9:28 [Bug rtl-optimization/54524] New: Spurious add on sum of bitshifts jan.smets@alcatel-lucent.com ` (11 preceding siblings ...) 2012-12-03 15:43 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-01-07 13:31 ` jan.smets@alcatel-lucent.com 12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread From: jan.smets@alcatel-lucent.com @ 2013-01-07 13:31 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54524 Jan Smets <jan.smets@alcatel-lucent.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #10 from Jan Smets <jan.smets@alcatel-lucent.com> 2013-01-07 13:30:40 UTC --- Verified ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-01-07 13:31 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 14+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2012-09-08 9:28 [Bug rtl-optimization/54524] New: Spurious add on sum of bitshifts jan.smets@alcatel-lucent.com 2012-09-08 13:19 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/54524] " jan.smets@alcatel-lucent.com 2012-09-18 8:22 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/54524] Spurious add on sum of bitshifts (forward-propagate issue) jan.smets@alcatel-lucent.com 2012-09-18 12:42 ` jan.smets@alcatel-lucent.com 2012-09-18 13:06 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/54524] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-18 21:49 ` jan.smets@alcatel-lucent.com 2012-09-19 1:39 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-19 8:46 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-22 22:26 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-02 23:33 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-02 23:34 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/54524] [4.6/4.7 " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-03 18:25 ` jan.smets@alcatel-lucent.com 2012-12-03 15:43 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-07 13:31 ` jan.smets@alcatel-lucent.com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).