From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 069B73858D28; Thu,  4 May 2023 05:48:52 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 069B73858D28
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1683179332;
	bh=oJrCYX67LqxVNDveLe4I561kH1G8dRCZcDCn5ZnRVI0=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=bZO6z3bYQDp8ZEc4NzQGebZASGaWLD5AlJkQk8vuvZKRoWvpYO9yNjK71lkEKcfy+
	 VeNU2Kjs2Ilxyyz77XEDf5eWDLUE0JsHURtnL6TGXpgHLSWbxtNxFUQCh9hYwZwUFq
	 jQesnHY8iYaC5nyac9CdymztVqrw0DAWmHSQ5vSA=
From: "aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/54627] VRP uses lots of memory and
 compile-time
Date: Thu, 04 May 2023 05:48:51 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: compile-time-hog, memory-hog
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-54627-4-3NXi8MI5hP@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-54627-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-54627-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D54627

Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #3 from Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Just ran into this while looking for something else.  Should this be closed=
, as
the implementation of VRP is different now?  (i.e. no equivalence set bitma=
ps).=