From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 82AD23858D28; Thu,  4 May 2023 09:29:12 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 82AD23858D28
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1683192552;
	bh=n4CF/rQLGupMMo7i4HLaLEToTfQ1E+5jinEY0eZHY7c=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=P9SzxNk0UdR3NeDZYmnnNd1FjRVFgdcFer59khPte5IuFpyfkNGa/3V4PBjnsJYCT
	 7GGQZ1cnFN9RJTWQabZCicmJ3Is4W7O4j3z8GamoQqizHbMUTsrbIhhy9LDO1avQEl
	 D55KUSR1kNDx02I9j1aZdIal8g0xPHaxlbyksQYI=
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/54627] VRP uses lots of memory and
 compile-time
Date: Thu, 04 May 2023 09:29:12 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: compile-time-hog, memory-hog
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-54627-4-SJSA3WznWa@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-54627-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-54627-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D54627

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED

--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Definitely, this looks specific to the old implementation.  I'm re-evaluati=
ng
PR56113.=