From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-401584-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 8588 invoked by alias); 22 Sep 2012 01:45:58 -0000
Received: (qmail 8523 invoked by uid 48); 22 Sep 2012 01:45:31 -0000
From: "baker at usgs dot gov" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/54630] [4.8 Regression] GCC 4.8 --enable-languages=c build fails: Undefined symbols: ___cxa_guard_acquire and ___cxa_guard_release
Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2012 01:45:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: blocker
X-Bugzilla-Who: baker at usgs dot gov
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.8.0
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-54630-4-UrdkhMEGGd@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-54630-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-54630-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-09/txt/msg01750.txt.bz2


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54630

--- Comment #8 from Larry Baker <baker at usgs dot gov> 2012-09-22 01:45:31 UTC ---
After changing --with-host-libstdcxx back to

--with-host-libstdcxx='-static-libgcc -Wl,-Bstatic,-lstdc++,-Bdynamic -lm'

the build succeeds for Linux i386.  I am sure LINKER was set to gcc in this
case.

I am rebuilding without --with-host-libstdcxx to verify that the cross compiler
can be built when LINKER is set to g++ for Linux i386.

After that, I'll try to use a newer GCC on CentoS Linux i386 and try again with
--with-host-libstdcxx='-static-libgcc -static-libstdc++ -lm'.  This seems to be
the more modern equivalent on more recent gcc/g++ compilers.  I found 4.6 and
4.7 compilers include both -static-libgcc and -static-libstdc++ (strings
host-gcc/g++-compiler | grep [-]static[-]).

You can probably reclassify this case from a bug to a feature request.