public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "baker at usgs dot gov" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/54630] [4.8 Regression] GCC 4.8 --enable-languages=c build fails: Undefined symbols: ___cxa_guard_acquire and ___cxa_guard_release
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 18:58:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-54630-4-bQhGGG4wWF@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-54630-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54630

--- Comment #4 from Larry Baker <baker at usgs dot gov> 2012-09-21 18:56:20 UTC ---
Richard,

On both Mac OS X and Linux, the link step uses gcc.

On Mac OS X, the link succeed; on Linux, the link fails.

The LINKER is selected by the following logic in the gcc/Makefile:

# The name of the compiler to use.
COMPILER = $(CXX)
COMPILER_FLAGS = $(CXXFLAGS)
# If HOST_LIBS is set, then the user is controlling the libraries to
# link against.  In that case, link with $(CC) so that the -lstdc++
# library is not introduced.  If HOST_LIBS is not set, link with
# $(CXX) to pick up -lstdc++.
ifeq ($(HOST_LIBS),)
LINKER = $(CXX)
LINKER_FLAGS = $(CXXFLAGS)
else
LINKER = $(CC)
LINKER_FLAGS = $(CFLAGS)
endif

The reason LINKER is set to gcc on both systems is I use the configure
--with-host-libstdcxx option:

Mac OS X: --with-host-libstdcxx='-lstdc++ -lm'
Linux: --with-host-libstdcxx='-static-libgcc -static-libstdc++ -lm'

(I don't know why the -lm is there; I copied that from Sourcery's ColdFire
uClinux SDK build script.)

which defines HOST_LIBS in gcc/Makefile:

# Libraries to use on the host.
Mac OS X: HOST_LIBS = -lstdc++ -lm
Linux: HOST_LIBS = -static-libgcc -static-libstdc++ -lm

The original --with-host-libstdcxx from Sourcery (Mentor Graphics) ColdFire
uClinux SDK build scripts was:

--with-host-libstdcxx='-static-libgcc -Wl,-Bstatic,-lstdc++,-Bdynamic -lm'

I guess Sourcery used '-static-libgcc -Wl,-Bstatic,-lstdc++,-Bdynamic -lm' so
that the cross compilers would not have system library dependencies, and could
be delivered in a tarball that would work on many Linux systems without
introducing a shared-llibrary dependency.

I altered that to use the more recent gcc option -static-libstdc++ in place of
-Wl,-Bstatic,-lstdc++,-Bdynamic.

I'm thinking a couple things are happening:

• On Mac OS X, the link works because I do not use static libraries (Mac OS X
does not support them), and -lstdc++ brings in the O/S version of guard.cc.
• On CentOS Linux 6.3, gcc is too old to recognize -static-libstdc++.  (I'm
assuming a more recent gcc driver recognizes it; it may be that it is only
recognized by the g++ driver.)  I'll try to make a more recent HOST gcc that
supports -static-libstdc++.  (Anyone know which release added it?)

However, I do not understand the logic of selecting gcc in the first place.

--with-host-libstdcxx is described at
http://gcc.gnu.org/install/configure.html:

--with-host-libstdcxx=linker-args
If you are linking with a static copy of PPL, you can use this option to
specify how the linker should find the standard C++ library used internally by
PPL. Typical values of linker-args might be `-lstdc++' or
`-Wl,-Bstatic,-lstdc++,-Bdynamic -lm'. If you are linking with a shared copy of
PPL, you probably do not need this option; shared library dependencies will
cause the linker to search for the standard C++ library automatically. 

This implies two things to me:

1) This is the only way to pass linker args (that I could find)
2) This is for c++ (...-libstdcxx means c++, right?)

The "linker-args" get turned into HOST_LIBS in gcc/Makefile, used to define
LIBS and BACKENDLIBS:

# How to link with both our special library facilities
# and the system's installed libraries.
LIBS =  libcommon.a $(CPPLIB) $(LIBINTL) $(LIBICONV) $(LIBIBERTY) \
    $(LIBDECNUMBER) $(HOST_LIBS)
BACKENDLIBS = $(CLOOGLIBS) $(GMPLIBS) $(PLUGINLIBS) $(HOST_LIBS) \
    $(ZLIB)

which, to me, means something different than "linker-args".

It seems to me that a main program compiled by g++ should be linked by g++. 
Linker args are a separate matter.

In any case, the web page should probably be updated to warn that
--with-host-libstdcxx causes ALL linking (at least for the compilers) to use
gcc instead of g++.  This matters now because GCC's implementation language
changes from C to C++ with release 4.8.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-09-21 18:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-19 21:15 [Bug libstdc++/54630] New: " baker at usgs dot gov
2012-09-20 11:37 ` [Bug middle-end/54630] [4.8 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-09-20 20:28 ` baker at usgs dot gov
2012-09-20 20:30 ` baker at usgs dot gov
2012-09-21 18:58 ` baker at usgs dot gov [this message]
2012-09-21 19:17 ` baker at usgs dot gov
2012-09-21 20:35 ` baker at usgs dot gov
2012-09-22  1:14 ` baker at usgs dot gov
2012-09-22  1:45 ` baker at usgs dot gov
2012-09-25  1:53 ` baker at usgs dot gov
2012-11-19  3:02 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-11-19 13:44 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-11-20  9:24 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-11-20 19:58 ` baker at usgs dot gov
2012-11-20 20:20 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-11-20 22:25 ` baker at usgs dot gov
2012-11-21 11:20 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-11-21 21:38 ` baker at usgs dot gov
2012-11-22  0:51 ` ian at airs dot com
2012-11-26 19:44 ` baker at usgs dot gov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-54630-4-bQhGGG4wWF@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).