From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18480 invoked by alias); 5 Oct 2012 17:04:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 18373 invoked by uid 48); 5 Oct 2012 17:04:37 -0000 From: "glisse at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/54686] std::abs (long long) resorts to std::abs (double) if llabs is absent Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2012 17:04:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: glisse at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: glisse at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.8.0 X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-10/txt/msg00458.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54686 --- Comment #40 from Marc Glisse 2012-10-05 17:04:35 UTC --- (In reply to comment #38) > Eh, eh, hard to reconstruct now what happened at the time. Looks like an svn > pasto or a plain pasto. I suppose that entire block can be removed? Probably, I'll leave that to you. Testing for the patch adding abs is in progress. Removing that block would make the c_global and c_std versions even closer...