From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11266 invoked by alias); 26 Sep 2012 14:14:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 10360 invoked by uid 48); 26 Sep 2012 14:13:33 -0000 From: "bernds at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug bootstrap/54688] [4.8 regression] violation of implicit restriction "No_Elaboration_Code" on a-ioexce.ads Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 14:14:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: bootstrap X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: bernds at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.8.0 X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-09/txt/msg02191.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54688 --- Comment #9 from Bernd Schmidt 2012-09-26 14:13:31 UTC --- Created attachment 28283 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28283 Candidate patch. The offset range should not be an issue with the right constraints etc.; the port really ought to be changed. In the meantime, please try this patch.