public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "hubicka at ucw dot cz" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/54717] [4.8 Regression] Runtime regression: polyhedron test "rnflow" degraded
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 19:43:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-54717-4-oRRcfu4uyP@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-54717-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54717

--- Comment #13 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at ucw dot cz> 2012-11-14 19:43:00 UTC ---
> So for the loop that starting at bb 28 you can see the xxtrt_46 access was not
> put into pretemp. Possible reason is exactly as it was mentioned by Richard -
> there were extra candidates collected and this one become less anticipatable
> 
> Skipping partial partial redundancy for expression                    
> {array_ref<pretmp_8,0,4>,mem_ref<0B>,xxtrt_46(D)}@.MEM_30(D) (0165)   
>    not partially anticipated on any to be optimized for speed edges    
>   -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Found partial partial redundancy for expression
>  {array_ref<pretmp_8,0,4>,mem_ref<0B>,xxtrt_46(D)}@.MEM_30(D) (0165)
> Created phi prephitmp_237 = PHI <_88(90), _85(29)>
>  in block 30

Hmm, interesting, what is the edge resonsible?
I would expect it to be the loopback edge and its frequency is:
;;   basic block 28, loop depth 0, count 0, freq 1998, maybe hot
;;    prev block 92, next block 94, flags: (NEW, REACHABLE)
;;    pred:       92 [100.0%, 180]  (FALLTHRU)
;;                96 [100.0%, 1818]  (FALLTHRU,DFS_BACK)
  # ival2_136 = PHI <ival2_62(92), ival2_144(96)>
  # ival2_140 = PHI <ival2_80(92), ival2_146(96)>
  _137 = (integer(kind=8)) ival2_136;
  _138 = _137 + -1;
  _139 = *xxtrt_25(D)[_138];
  _141 = (integer(kind=8)) ival2_140;
  _142 = _141 + -1;
  _143 = *xxtrt_25(D)[_142];
  if (_139 < _143)
    goto <bb 29>; 
  else            
    goto <bb 94>;

1818 that should be still hot.  Or isn't the heuristic backwards? I.e. I would
expect
the partial anticipance to sit on edge 92->28 (with freq 180) where we need to
insert
the computation to get the other path hot.

Honza


  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-11-14 19:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-26 12:54 [Bug tree-optimization/54717] New: " sergos.gnu at gmail dot com
2012-09-26 13:17 ` [Bug tree-optimization/54717] " ubizjak at gmail dot com
2012-09-26 14:17 ` [Bug tree-optimization/54717] [4.8 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-09-26 15:12 ` sergos.gnu at gmail dot com
2012-09-26 15:41 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2012-09-26 20:07 ` sergos.gnu at gmail dot com
2012-09-27  9:28 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-09-27 10:43 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-10-02 20:24 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2012-10-08  8:55 ` sergos.gnu at gmail dot com
2012-11-13 18:40 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2012-11-13 18:54 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2012-11-14 18:56 ` sergos.gnu at gmail dot com
2012-11-14 19:42   ` Jan Hubicka
2012-11-14 19:43 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz [this message]
2012-11-14 20:11 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-11-15 10:28 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-11-15 10:52 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-11-15 15:07 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2012-11-16 10:37 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-12-06 16:51 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-54717-4-oRRcfu4uyP@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).