public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "burnus at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/54756] [OOP] Should reject CLASS, intent(out) in PURE procedures
Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 18:30:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-54756-4-WFXhQLXbnb@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-54756-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54756

Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |burnus at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-09-29 18:30:38 UTC ---
The constraint belonging to that note (from the same corrigendum):

"C1278a  An INTENT(OUT) dummy argument of a pure procedure shall not be
polymorphic."


I think the rational is that a FINAL subroutine might be IMPURE and one could
thus invoke an IMPURE procedure through that back door - and it is not
detectable at compile time.

  * * *

Note that there is the related constraint:

C1284a   A statement that might result in the deallocation of a polymorphic
entity is not permitted in a pure procedure.

NOTE 12.48x
Apart from the DEALLOCATE statement, this includes intrinsic assignment if the
variable has a polymorphic allocatable component at any level of component
selection that does not involve a pointer component but which might involve one
or more allocatable components.


  reply	other threads:[~2012-09-29 18:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-29 18:19 [Bug fortran/54756] New: " burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-09-29 18:30 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2012-09-29 18:33 ` [Bug fortran/54756] " burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-11-06 10:10 ` [Bug fortran/54756] [OOP] [F08] " janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-11-06 17:58 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-11-06 21:20 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-12-21 12:19 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2014-12-22 15:50 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-12-22 15:56 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-12-27 22:41 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-12-27 22:43 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-54756-4-WFXhQLXbnb@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).