public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "burnus at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/54756] [OOP] Should reject CLASS, intent(out) in PURE procedures Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 18:30:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-54756-4-WFXhQLXbnb@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-54756-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54756 Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-09-29 18:30:38 UTC --- The constraint belonging to that note (from the same corrigendum): "C1278a An INTENT(OUT) dummy argument of a pure procedure shall not be polymorphic." I think the rational is that a FINAL subroutine might be IMPURE and one could thus invoke an IMPURE procedure through that back door - and it is not detectable at compile time. * * * Note that there is the related constraint: C1284a A statement that might result in the deallocation of a polymorphic entity is not permitted in a pure procedure. NOTE 12.48x Apart from the DEALLOCATE statement, this includes intrinsic assignment if the variable has a polymorphic allocatable component at any level of component selection that does not involve a pointer component but which might involve one or more allocatable components.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-29 18:30 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2012-09-29 18:19 [Bug fortran/54756] New: " burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-29 18:30 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2012-09-29 18:33 ` [Bug fortran/54756] " burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-06 10:10 ` [Bug fortran/54756] [OOP] [F08] " janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-06 17:58 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-06 21:20 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-12-21 12:19 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2014-12-22 15:50 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-12-22 15:56 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-12-27 22:41 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-12-27 22:43 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-54756-4-WFXhQLXbnb@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).