From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32606 invoked by alias); 6 Dec 2012 20:39:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 31195 invoked by uid 48); 6 Dec 2012 20:38:46 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug debug/54774] insufficient debug info for strong typed enum Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2012 20:39:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: debug X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Summary Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-12/txt/msg00609.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54774 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|[4.4.4, 4.5, 4.6, 4.7] |insufficient debug info for |insufficient debug info for |strong typed enum |strong typed enum | --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-12-06 20:38:45 UTC --- But it isn't a regression, so Summary shouldn't be changed for that fact. You can fill in Known to work: (guess empty) and Known to fail:.