public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "adivilceanu at yahoo dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/54791] AIX-only: Constructors are not called in main program. Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2012 21:50:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-54791-4-2XJPqROG47@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-54791-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54791 --- Comment #15 from Adi <adivilceanu at yahoo dot com> 2012-11-06 21:49:47 UTC --- This is a follow up on comment 14. It seems that -fPIC dramatically improved the way constructors are called. It seems that the linker has some logic and is initializing the globals from various object files in a correct order.(it somehow checks the dependencies betweeen globals I assume). I don't know how this is happening yet. As I see the ctors array has the same elements(except for the generated name that has changed), so something other then the ctors list is involved here. Do you know what? Now this works on my exe that is linked with static libs. Now if I go and link my exe with the shared version of my libs than it is not working. I saw this is because first all the constructors from the exe are called first and only after that constructors from the shared libs are called. But as I said I need some objects from the shared lib constructed first before objects in the main exe are initialized. Do you know how I can solve this case ?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-06 21:50 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2012-10-03 9:20 [Bug c++/54791] New: " adivilceanu at yahoo dot com 2012-10-03 9:40 ` [Bug target/54791] " paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-10-03 13:47 ` dje at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-02 14:49 ` adivilceanu at yahoo dot com 2012-11-02 14:52 ` adivilceanu at yahoo dot com 2012-11-03 6:21 ` adivilceanu at yahoo dot com 2012-11-03 6:24 ` adivilceanu at yahoo dot com 2012-11-03 13:49 ` dje at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-03 19:15 ` adivilceanu at yahoo dot com 2012-11-03 22:48 ` dje at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-05 14:34 ` adivilceanu at yahoo dot com 2012-11-05 18:55 ` dje at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-05 21:14 ` adivilceanu at yahoo dot com 2012-11-06 14:46 ` dje at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-06 16:23 ` adivilceanu at yahoo dot com 2012-11-06 21:50 ` adivilceanu at yahoo dot com [this message] 2012-11-07 1:27 ` dje at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-07 14:46 ` adivilceanu at yahoo dot com 2012-11-07 15:25 ` adivilceanu at yahoo dot com 2012-11-07 22:15 ` dje at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-13 8:21 ` adivilceanu at yahoo dot com 2012-11-13 8:30 ` adivilceanu at yahoo dot com 2012-11-13 14:03 ` dje at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-13 14:09 ` adivilceanu at yahoo dot com 2012-11-14 14:20 ` dje at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-27 15:54 ` adivilceanu at yahoo dot com 2012-11-27 18:55 ` adivilceanu at yahoo dot com 2012-11-27 19:01 ` adivilceanu at yahoo dot com 2012-11-27 20:42 ` dje at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-28 14:01 ` adivilceanu at yahoo dot com 2012-11-28 19:35 ` dje at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-29 9:35 ` adivilceanu at yahoo dot com 2012-11-29 9:44 ` adivilceanu at yahoo dot com 2012-12-01 21:42 ` dje at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-03-18 12:42 ` dje at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-03-18 12:49 ` dje at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-54791-4-2XJPqROG47@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).