public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "dje at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/54791] AIX-only: Constructors are not called in main program.
Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2012 22:48:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-54791-4-ik6yQCVec1@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-54791-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54791

David Edelsohn <dje at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2012-11-03
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #9 from David Edelsohn <dje at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-11-03 22:48:06 UTC ---
> So just to be 100% sure on this: If I want to be sure all my constructors are
> called I should not have any of them inlined. Correct ?
> What about if I have a constructor body/implementation inside a class
> declaration ? Does the compiler inline that as well? I guess it might.

I am not positive that inlining is the problem, but that seems like a good
hypothesis.  collect2 scans object files looking for constructors by name,
e.g.,

GLOBAL__I_<xxxx>

You can look at the global symbols using

$ nm -BCpg xxxx.o

If the constructors are visible when NOT inlined and disappear when they are
inlined, that is the problem.  If "nm" cannot see them, the mechanism for
creating the list of constructors (and destructors) cannot see them either.

> So how do you see this case. Is it not a bug? I mean I am expecting my
> constructors to be called and they are not.
> Do you know a easy way to solve this without modifying all my constructors ?
> (any compiler options perhaps, ..using __attribute__((constructor)) ) ?

The methods already are constructors.  Additional attributes will not make a
difference.

If you can create a small, self-contained testcase with a constructor that
works or does not work depending on inlined, I can look. I am not sure how
inlined constructors are recorded in ELF files.  This sounds like a bug, but it
will take some investigation to figure out how difficult it is to fix given the
behavior of AIX and GCC.  Inlined constructors may not be a practical option on
AIX.

Also, please use the GCC Bugzilla interface for comments and attaching
testcases, not email replies. There probably is a way to add attachments using
email, but I do not know how and Bugzilla is much more useful without all of
the email history already present in the comment history.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-11-03 22:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-10-03  9:20 [Bug c++/54791] New: " adivilceanu at yahoo dot com
2012-10-03  9:40 ` [Bug target/54791] " paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2012-10-03 13:47 ` dje at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-11-02 14:49 ` adivilceanu at yahoo dot com
2012-11-02 14:52 ` adivilceanu at yahoo dot com
2012-11-03  6:21 ` adivilceanu at yahoo dot com
2012-11-03  6:24 ` adivilceanu at yahoo dot com
2012-11-03 13:49 ` dje at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-11-03 19:15 ` adivilceanu at yahoo dot com
2012-11-03 22:48 ` dje at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2012-11-05 14:34 ` adivilceanu at yahoo dot com
2012-11-05 18:55 ` dje at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-11-05 21:14 ` adivilceanu at yahoo dot com
2012-11-06 14:46 ` dje at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-11-06 16:23 ` adivilceanu at yahoo dot com
2012-11-06 21:50 ` adivilceanu at yahoo dot com
2012-11-07  1:27 ` dje at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-11-07 14:46 ` adivilceanu at yahoo dot com
2012-11-07 15:25 ` adivilceanu at yahoo dot com
2012-11-07 22:15 ` dje at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-11-13  8:21 ` adivilceanu at yahoo dot com
2012-11-13  8:30 ` adivilceanu at yahoo dot com
2012-11-13 14:03 ` dje at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-11-13 14:09 ` adivilceanu at yahoo dot com
2012-11-14 14:20 ` dje at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-11-27 15:54 ` adivilceanu at yahoo dot com
2012-11-27 18:55 ` adivilceanu at yahoo dot com
2012-11-27 19:01 ` adivilceanu at yahoo dot com
2012-11-27 20:42 ` dje at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-11-28 14:01 ` adivilceanu at yahoo dot com
2012-11-28 19:35 ` dje at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-11-29  9:35 ` adivilceanu at yahoo dot com
2012-11-29  9:44 ` adivilceanu at yahoo dot com
2012-12-01 21:42 ` dje at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-18 12:42 ` dje at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-18 12:49 ` dje at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-54791-4-ik6yQCVec1@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).