From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-405536-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 14099 invoked by alias); 3 Nov 2012 06:24:21 -0000
Received: (qmail 13975 invoked by uid 55); 3 Nov 2012 06:24:04 -0000
From: "adivilceanu at yahoo dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/54791] AIX-only: Constructors are not called in main program.
Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2012 06:24:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: major
X-Bugzilla-Who: adivilceanu at yahoo dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-54791-4-wN28kiZfzx@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-54791-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-54791-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-11/txt/msg00198.txt.bz2


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D54791

--- Comment #6 from Adi <adivilceanu at yahoo dot com> 2012-11-03 06:24:03 =
UTC ---
This is the 5thmail I am sending(I got 4 delivery errors because of MIME
attachments).


After more investigation I saw that I managed to get the constructors=20
called by removing the "inline" keyword from just one constructor of a=20
class that resides in my master header.

=46rom my -Wl,-debug linker
 options I see that this particular constructor name is used to generate
 the dynamic initialization in almost every object file.
See debug.txt attached for more details. Look for
"_GLOBAL__I_65535_0__ZN5TraceD2Ev".


Do you know why would that be?=C2=A0=C2=A0=20
Is this a bug ?
Do you know why on Linux with the same compiler version and same code is not
happening?

I have around 1000 member functions that are declared "inline" across vario=
us
classes.

Do you know if there are any know issues with inline and
 constructors? Any compiler options I should be
 aware of? I am not using any optimization (yet .. I am planning to).=20

Now
 after I did this I am still having some other problems. Some object=20
seemed are not initialized properly.=C2=A0 I am still suspecting the other=
=20
inlines might be the culprit.

Any ideas/suggestions would be appreciated.