From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30193 invoked by alias); 19 Dec 2012 09:04:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 30144 invoked by uid 48); 19 Dec 2012 09:03:47 -0000 From: "burnus at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/54818] [4.7/4.8 Regression] error: type mismatch in binary expression Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 09:04:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.7.3 X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-12/txt/msg01832.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54818 --- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus 2012-12-19 09:03:46 UTC --- My patch is wrong. It might lead to passing an integer(8) instead of integer(4) as hidden argument when calling a procedure. The proper way it to use gfc_charlen_type_node. However, the following works: --- a/gcc/fortran/trans-intrinsic.c +++ b/gcc/fortran/trans-intrinsic.c @@ -5664,3 +5664,3 @@ scalar_transfer: se->expr = tmpdecl; - se->string_length = dest_word_len; + se->string_length = fold_convert (gfc_charlen_type_node, dest_word_len); }