From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15569 invoked by alias); 8 Oct 2012 08:45:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 14938 invoked by uid 48); 8 Oct 2012 08:44:53 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug debug/54831] [4.8 Regression] ICE: in vt_add_function_parameter, at var-tracking.c:9412 with -O -fno-split-wide-types -g Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2012 08:45:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: debug X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: CC Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-10/txt/msg00650.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54831 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-10-08 08:44:50 UTC --- That doesn't make much sense, as it wouldn't be tracked anyway, too much code would need to be changed to also track PARALLELs. I'd say the easiest fix would be just turn that gcc_assert into if (!assert_cond) return; and adjust the comment not to say that we assert something. Alex, what do you think?