public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/54847] --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes non-functional on darwin
Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2012 19:43:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-54847-4-lLi6bTYLos@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-54847-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54847

--- Comment #10 from Jack Howarth <howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu> 2012-10-07 19:43:25 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> 
> I can certainly participate.  I just need to make sure that I don't read any
> code snippets that are GPL3 licensed.
> 

Well it is absurd to read bugzilla and not expect to run across GPLv3 code
fragments. In any case, 
this minor change the configure test compiles and runs fine on
x86_64-apple-darwin11...

#include <unistd.h>
         #include <time.h>

int
main ()
{
#if _POSIX_TIMERS > 0
          timespec tp;
#else
          struct timespec tp;
#endif
          nanosleep(&tp, 0);

  ;
  return 0;
}

ISo the question is whether the header fragment needs any adjustment once the
configure passes the check for nanosleep() support. I'll test locally. 
    Paolo, are there any specific libstdc++-v3 test cases that I should look at
once libstc++-v3 is using nanosleep() to check for proper function?


  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-10-07 19:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-10-07 16:11 [Bug libstdc++/54847] New: " howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
2012-10-07 17:31 ` [Bug libstdc++/54847] " paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2012-10-07 17:40 ` jeremyhu at macports dot org
2012-10-07 18:02 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2012-10-07 18:35 ` jeremyhu at macports dot org
2012-10-07 18:51 ` howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
2012-10-07 18:54 ` howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
2012-10-07 19:04 ` jeremyhu at macports dot org
2012-10-07 19:22 ` howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
2012-10-07 19:38 ` jeremyhu at macports dot org
2012-10-07 19:43 ` howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu [this message]
2012-10-07 20:11 ` howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
2012-10-07 22:17 ` howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
2012-10-07 22:29 ` howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
2012-10-07 22:51 ` jeremyhu at macports dot org
2012-10-07 23:03 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2012-10-07 23:07 ` jeremyhu at macports dot org
2012-10-07 23:14 ` roblu2184 at gmail dot com
2012-10-07 23:15 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2012-10-07 23:19 ` roblu2184 at gmail dot com
2012-10-07 23:26 ` jeremyhu at macports dot org
2012-10-07 23:33 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2012-10-08  3:48 ` jeremyhu at macports dot org
2012-10-08  9:26 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2012-10-08 10:06 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-10-08 11:00 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-10-08 11:17 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-10-08 13:47 ` howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
2012-10-08 14:03 ` howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
2012-10-08 14:33 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-10-08 14:47 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-10-08 15:14 ` [Bug libstdc++/54847] --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes doesn't find the functional nanosleep() " howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
2012-10-08 15:31 ` howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
2012-10-08 15:55 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-10-08 16:03 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-10-08 16:31 ` howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
2012-10-08 16:45 ` howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
2012-10-08 16:48 ` [Bug libstdc++/54847] --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes doesn't find the function " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-10-08 17:04 ` howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
2012-10-08 17:16 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-10-08 18:33 ` jeremyhu at macports dot org
2012-10-08 19:50 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-10-08 20:10 ` jeremyhu at macports dot org
2012-10-08 20:31 ` howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
2012-10-08 20:42 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-10-08 22:27 ` howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
2012-10-09  0:46 ` howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
2012-10-10 23:20 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-11-06 11:35 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-54847-4-lLi6bTYLos@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).