From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-402926-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 1149 invoked by alias); 7 Oct 2012 16:13:40 -0000
Received: (qmail 31394 invoked by uid 48); 7 Oct 2012 16:13:22 -0000
From: "mikulas at artax dot karlin.mff.cuni.cz" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/54848] New: -ftrapv doesn't work when assigning to an integer with smaller size
Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2012 16:13:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: mikulas at artax dot karlin.mff.cuni.cz
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-54848-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-10/txt/msg00602.txt.bz2


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54848

             Bug #: 54848
           Summary: -ftrapv doesn't work when assigning to an integer with
                    smaller size
    Classification: Unclassified
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.7.2
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: middle-end
        AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
        ReportedBy: mikulas@artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz
              Host: i686-pc-linux-gnu
            Target: i686-pc-linux-gnu
             Build: i686-pc-linux-gnu


When adding, subtracting or multiplying two integers and assigning the result
to a variable with smaller size, trap on overflow doesn't happen.

See for example this program:

#include <stdio.h>

int main(void)
{
        int a = 0x70000000;
        int b = 0x50000000;
        short c = a + b;
        printf("%x\n", c);
        return 0;
}

We compile the program without optimization and with -ftrapv, so that it should
crash because of integer overflow. But the program doesn't crash. If we replace
"short" with "int", an overflow crash happens correctly.