From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14154 invoked by alias); 11 Oct 2012 09:05:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 14008 invoked by uid 55); 11 Oct 2012 09:05:19 -0000 From: "ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/54868] [4.8 Regression]gcc.dg/tree-ssa/forwprop-22.c FAILs Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 09:05:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.8.0 X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-10/txt/msg01043.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54868 --- Comment #4 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-10-11 09:05:18 UTC --- > --- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse 2012-10-10 > 04:58:40 UTC --- > (In reply to comment #2) >> Maybe moving the test from tree-ssa/ to vect/ would be enough? > > I tried that and tested on x86_64, but the test wasn't run then (no trace in > any log). I'll try to look again later, but that might only be in a few days. > > If anyone understands how the testsuite works... Have a look at vect.exp: there are specific naming conventions for testcases that control how they are compiled. Rainer