public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libfortran/54878] libgfortran issues found by the Coverity scanner
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2021 18:23:45 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-54878-4-lZ2Dy0Y0Bp@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-54878-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54878

Francois-Xavier Coudert <fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #3 from Francois-Xavier Coudert <fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The followings don't exist anymore in the current code: a, b, c, h.

d) is still present, but it is for generated code, due to the very generic way
the code is being generated. Not an issue.

e) is still present. I think it's guaranteed that base is not NULL, but someone
might want to double-check the logic there.

f) was fixed in:

commit a0b012be6aef65bd11107f8dac814c3ac36f95d0
Author: Tobias Burnus <burnus@net-b.de>
Date:   2013-03-29 10:32:57 +0100

g) Not sure why it's considered bad practice to ignore the return value of a
function call. In some cases, it's not a problem.

      parent reply	other threads:[~2021-12-16 18:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-10-09 20:55 [Bug fortran/54878] New: " burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-10-10 18:42 ` [Bug fortran/54878] " burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-12-21 12:37 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2021-12-16 18:23 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-54878-4-lZ2Dy0Y0Bp@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).