From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5940 invoked by alias); 10 Oct 2012 09:08:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 5859 invoked by uid 48); 10 Oct 2012 09:08:35 -0000 From: "janus at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/54884] [4.8 Regression] Externally used PRIVATE module procedure wrongly marked as TREE_PUBLIC()=0 Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 09:08:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: janus at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.8.0 X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: CC Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-10/txt/msg00930.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54884 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-10 09:08:35 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > Duplicate of pr54221 (see comment #5)? > > Duplicate of PR54221: No, that's a completely separate issue. > Duplicate of PR54221 comment 5: Well, it links to the Andrew's bug-reporting > email, hence, it is a duplicate. Well, I guess the point is that Dominique claimed that the bug reported by Andrew is a regression of your commit for PR54221: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2012-10/msg00047.html