* [Bug bootstrap/54926] [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failure for various files in libbacktrace
2012-10-14 22:17 [Bug bootstrap/54926] New: [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failure for various files in libbacktrace danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-10-15 6:45 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2012-10-15 9:46 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (14 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: ubizjak at gmail dot com @ 2012-10-15 6:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54926
--- Comment #1 from Uros Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> 2012-10-15 06:44:57 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> Problem was introduced in r191981.
The patch just introduces -funwind-tables to compile flags, so I really don't
see how this can cause any difference.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/54926] [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failure for various files in libbacktrace
2012-10-14 22:17 [Bug bootstrap/54926] New: [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failure for various files in libbacktrace danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-10-15 6:45 ` [Bug bootstrap/54926] " ubizjak at gmail dot com
@ 2012-10-15 9:46 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-10-15 11:55 ` dave.anglin at bell dot net
` (13 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-10-15 9:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54926
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/54926] [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failure for various files in libbacktrace
2012-10-14 22:17 [Bug bootstrap/54926] New: [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failure for various files in libbacktrace danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-10-15 6:45 ` [Bug bootstrap/54926] " ubizjak at gmail dot com
2012-10-15 9:46 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-10-15 11:55 ` dave.anglin at bell dot net
2012-11-29 20:49 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (12 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: dave.anglin at bell dot net @ 2012-10-15 11:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54926
--- Comment #2 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-10-15 11:55:29 UTC ---
On 15-Oct-12, at 2:44 AM, ubizjak at gmail dot com wrote:
> The patch just introduces -funwind-tables to compile flags, so I
> really don't
> see how this can cause any difference.
I hacked configure to turn -funwind-tables off on hpux. It is the
cause of the comparison
difference.
The difference isn't caused by incorrect code. Think the compare
needs to be ignored
on hpux.
Dave
--
John David Anglin dave.anglin@bell.net
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/54926] [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failure for various files in libbacktrace
2012-10-14 22:17 [Bug bootstrap/54926] New: [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failure for various files in libbacktrace danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2012-10-15 11:55 ` dave.anglin at bell dot net
@ 2012-11-29 20:49 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-12-02 17:17 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (11 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: danglin at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-11-29 20:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54926
John David Anglin <danglin at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
--- Comment #3 from John David Anglin <danglin at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-11-29 20:49:29 UTC ---
Fixed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/54926] [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failure for various files in libbacktrace
2012-10-14 22:17 [Bug bootstrap/54926] New: [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failure for various files in libbacktrace danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2012-11-29 20:49 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-12-02 17:17 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-12-03 15:56 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (10 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: danglin at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-12-02 17:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54926
John David Anglin <danglin at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Last reconfirmed| |2012-12-02
Resolution|FIXED |
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #4 from John David Anglin <danglin at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-12-02 17:17:06 UTC ---
Comment #3 is incorrect. Thought the configure change to check
for -funwind-tables support fixed the compare failure, it turns
out it doesn't disable unwind-table support.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/54926] [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failure for various files in libbacktrace
2012-10-14 22:17 [Bug bootstrap/54926] New: [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failure for various files in libbacktrace danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2012-12-02 17:17 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-12-03 15:56 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-12-03 16:06 ` dave.anglin at bell dot net
` (9 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-12-03 15:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54926
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P3 |P1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/54926] [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failure for various files in libbacktrace
2012-10-14 22:17 [Bug bootstrap/54926] New: [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failure for various files in libbacktrace danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2012-12-03 15:56 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-12-03 16:06 ` dave.anglin at bell dot net
2012-12-03 22:33 ` dave.anglin at bell dot net
` (8 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: dave.anglin at bell dot net @ 2012-12-03 16:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54926
--- Comment #5 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-12-03 16:06:22 UTC ---
I have a patch to ignore the comparison failure and a couple changes to
libbacktrace
for hpux. The btest program now runs successfully on hpux. However,
backtrace still
doesn't work from within compiler.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/54926] [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failure for various files in libbacktrace
2012-10-14 22:17 [Bug bootstrap/54926] New: [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failure for various files in libbacktrace danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2012-12-03 16:06 ` dave.anglin at bell dot net
@ 2012-12-03 22:33 ` dave.anglin at bell dot net
2012-12-06 18:39 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: dave.anglin at bell dot net @ 2012-12-03 22:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54926
--- Comment #6 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-12-03 22:33:39 UTC ---
On 12/3/2012 11:06 AM, John David Anglin wrote:
> However, backtrace still doesn't work from within compiler.
>
Problem is with fileline_initialize. The techniques currently being used to
obtain the full pathname of the executable don't work on HP-UX.
http://www.cplusplus.com/forum/general/11104/
Dave
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/54926] [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failure for various files in libbacktrace
2012-10-14 22:17 [Bug bootstrap/54926] New: [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failure for various files in libbacktrace danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2012-12-03 22:33 ` dave.anglin at bell dot net
@ 2012-12-06 18:39 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-12-06 21:45 ` aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-12-06 18:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54926
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|REOPENED |WAITING
CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-12-06 18:39:03 UTC ---
For the bootstrap comparison failures, I'd guess libbacktrace should be built
with
-frandom-seed=$@
in CFLAGS similarly how libstdc++-v3 is built.
In what way doesn't backtrace work in the compiler? Does it crash, or not
print any backtrace? The former would be a regression, the latter would not.
So, does:
2012-12-06 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
PR bootstrap/54926
* Makefile.am (AM_CFLAGS): Add -frandom-seed=$@.
* Makefile.in: Regenerated.
--- libbacktrace/Makefile.am.jj 2012-10-02 15:36:21.000000000 +0200
+++ libbacktrace/Makefile.am 2012-12-06 19:36:05.888001803 +0100
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ ACLOCAL_AMFLAGS = -I .. -I ../config
AM_CPPFLAGS = -I $(top_srcdir)/../include -I $(top_srcdir)/../libgcc \
-I ../libgcc -I ../gcc/include -I $(MULTIBUILDTOP)../../gcc/include
-AM_CFLAGS = $(EXTRA_FLAGS) $(WARN_FLAGS) $(PIC_FLAG)
+AM_CFLAGS = $(EXTRA_FLAGS) $(WARN_FLAGS) $(PIC_FLAG) -frandom-seed=$@
noinst_LTLIBRARIES = libbacktrace.la
--- libbacktrace/Makefile.in.jj 2012-10-02 15:36:21.000000000 +0200
+++ libbacktrace/Makefile.in 2012-12-06 19:36:26.284875521 +0100
@@ -254,7 +254,7 @@ ACLOCAL_AMFLAGS = -I .. -I ../config
AM_CPPFLAGS = -I $(top_srcdir)/../include -I $(top_srcdir)/../libgcc \
-I ../libgcc -I ../gcc/include -I $(MULTIBUILDTOP)../../gcc/include
-AM_CFLAGS = $(EXTRA_FLAGS) $(WARN_FLAGS) $(PIC_FLAG)
+AM_CFLAGS = $(EXTRA_FLAGS) $(WARN_FLAGS) $(PIC_FLAG) -frandom-seed=$@
noinst_LTLIBRARIES = libbacktrace.la
libbacktrace_la_SOURCES = \
backtrace.h \
patch fix all the regressions, turning this just into enhancement request to
support libbacktrace better on HP-UX?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/54926] [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failure for various files in libbacktrace
2012-10-14 22:17 [Bug bootstrap/54926] New: [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failure for various files in libbacktrace danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2012-12-06 18:39 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-12-06 21:45 ` aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-12-07 13:33 ` dave.anglin at bell dot net
` (5 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-12-06 21:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54926
Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8 from Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-12-06 21:45:02 UTC ---
Jakub, the configury patch is ok, thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/54926] [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failure for various files in libbacktrace
2012-10-14 22:17 [Bug bootstrap/54926] New: [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failure for various files in libbacktrace danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2012-12-06 21:45 ` aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-12-07 13:33 ` dave.anglin at bell dot net
2012-12-07 14:14 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: dave.anglin at bell dot net @ 2012-12-07 13:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54926
--- Comment #9 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-12-07 13:33:16 UTC ---
On 6-Dec-12, at 1:39 PM, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54926
>
> Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
>
> What |Removed |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Status|REOPENED |WAITING
> CC| |jakub at gcc dot
> gnu.org
>
> --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org>
> 2012-12-06 18:39:03 UTC ---
> For the bootstrap comparison failures, I'd guess libbacktrace should
> be built
> with
> -frandom-seed=$@
> in CFLAGS similarly how libstdc++-v3 is built.
> In what way doesn't backtrace work in the compiler? Does it crash,
> or not
> print any backtrace? The former would be a regression, the latter
> would not.
> So, does:
> 2012-12-06 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
>
> PR bootstrap/54926
> * Makefile.am (AM_CFLAGS): Add -frandom-seed=$@.
> * Makefile.in: Regenerated.
>
> --- libbacktrace/Makefile.am.jj 2012-10-02 15:36:21.000000000 +0200
> +++ libbacktrace/Makefile.am 2012-12-06 19:36:05.888001803 +0100
> @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ ACLOCAL_AMFLAGS = -I .. -I ../config
> AM_CPPFLAGS = -I $(top_srcdir)/../include -I $(top_srcdir)/../libgcc \
> -I ../libgcc -I ../gcc/include -I $(MULTIBUILDTOP)../../gcc/
> include
>
> -AM_CFLAGS = $(EXTRA_FLAGS) $(WARN_FLAGS) $(PIC_FLAG)
> +AM_CFLAGS = $(EXTRA_FLAGS) $(WARN_FLAGS) $(PIC_FLAG) -frandom-seed=$@
>
> noinst_LTLIBRARIES = libbacktrace.la
>
> --- libbacktrace/Makefile.in.jj 2012-10-02 15:36:21.000000000 +0200
> +++ libbacktrace/Makefile.in 2012-12-06 19:36:26.284875521 +0100
> @@ -254,7 +254,7 @@ ACLOCAL_AMFLAGS = -I .. -I ../config
> AM_CPPFLAGS = -I $(top_srcdir)/../include -I $(top_srcdir)/../libgcc \
> -I ../libgcc -I ../gcc/include -I $(MULTIBUILDTOP)../../gcc/
> include
>
> -AM_CFLAGS = $(EXTRA_FLAGS) $(WARN_FLAGS) $(PIC_FLAG)
> +AM_CFLAGS = $(EXTRA_FLAGS) $(WARN_FLAGS) $(PIC_FLAG) -frandom-seed=$@
> noinst_LTLIBRARIES = libbacktrace.la
> libbacktrace_la_SOURCES = \
> backtrace.h \
>
> patch fix all the regressions, turning this just into enhancement
> request to
> support libbacktrace better on HP-UX?
The patch fixes the bootstrap comparison failure but I wouldn't say it
fixes all the regressions.
See attached patch.
1) The MAP_FAILED change to mmapio.c is needed to build successfully
on HP-UX 10.
2) The HAVE_SYNC_FUNCTIONS change fixes an abort which regresses the
handling
of ICEs.
The change to filename.c improves libbacktrace support on HP-UX
systems using ELF
binaries. With this change, I get a successful backtrace. For example,
spawn /test/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/xgcc -B/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/ /test/
gnu/gcc/gc
c/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr51447.c -fno-diagnostics-show-
caret -w -
O2 -lm -o /test/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/testsuite/gcc/pr51447.x2/test/gnu/
gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr51447.c: In function
'main':/test/gnu/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr51447.c:
27:1: internal c
ompiler error: in mark_jump_label_1, at jump.c:11340x40000000005c98cf
mark_jump_label_1 ../../gcc/gcc/jump.c:1134
0x40000000005c95df mark_jump_label_1 ../../gcc/gcc/jump.c:1194
0x40000000005c9347 mark_jump_label(rtx_def*, rtx_def*,
int) ../../gcc/gcc/jump.c:1061
0x40000000005c9b87 mark_all_labels
../../gcc/gcc/jump.c:303
0x40000000005c9b87 rebuild_jump_labels_1
../../gcc/gcc/jump.c:83
0x40000000005c9fb3 rebuild_jump_labels(rtx_def*)
../../gcc/gcc/jump.c:103
0x4000000000370177 cfg_layout_finalize()
../../gcc/gcc/cfgrtl.c:3805
0x4000000000a4d42f rest_of_handle_reorder_blocks
../../gcc/gcc/bb-reorder.c:2225
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
Please include the complete backtrace with any bug report.
See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
compiler exited with status 1
Possibly, the addresses could be truncated modulo 4.
Adding libbacktrace support to 32-bit PA HP-UX (SOM) looks to be a much
tougher. In addition, there is no equivalent to dlgetname. On HP-UX
11.11
and later, it is possible to get a path to the executable using the
pstat interface.
On earlier systems, a file system walk can be done but it is too
slow. Think
it would be better to use argv[0] with some additional checks.
Dave
--
John David Anglin dave.anglin@bell.net
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/54926] [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failure for various files in libbacktrace
2012-10-14 22:17 [Bug bootstrap/54926] New: [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failure for various files in libbacktrace danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2012-12-07 13:33 ` dave.anglin at bell dot net
@ 2012-12-07 14:14 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-12-07 14:19 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-12-07 14:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54926
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-12-07 14:14:33 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 7 14:14:25 2012
New Revision: 194303
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194303
Log:
PR bootstrap/54926
* Makefile.am (AM_CFLAGS): Add -frandom-seed=$@.
* Makefile.in: Regenerated.
Modified:
trunk/libbacktrace/ChangeLog
trunk/libbacktrace/Makefile.am
trunk/libbacktrace/Makefile.in
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/54926] [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failure for various files in libbacktrace
2012-10-14 22:17 [Bug bootstrap/54926] New: [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failure for various files in libbacktrace danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2012-12-07 14:14 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-12-07 14:19 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-12-11 11:41 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-12-07 14:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54926
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-12-07 14:19:31 UTC ---
Please post patches to gcc-patches.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/54926] [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failure for various files in libbacktrace
2012-10-14 22:17 [Bug bootstrap/54926] New: [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failure for various files in libbacktrace danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2012-12-07 14:19 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-12-11 11:41 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-12-11 18:46 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-12-21 12:15 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-12-11 11:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54926
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-12-11 11:41:04 UTC ---
Created attachment 28926
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28926
gcc48-pr54926.patch
Richard discovered that adding it unconditionally doesn't work with system
compilers, either too old g++'s or perhaps other vendor compilers.
Untested fix attached.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/54926] [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failure for various files in libbacktrace
2012-10-14 22:17 [Bug bootstrap/54926] New: [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failure for various files in libbacktrace danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2012-12-11 11:41 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-12-11 18:46 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-12-21 12:15 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-12-11 18:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54926
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-12-11 18:45:52 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Dec 11 18:45:45 2012
New Revision: 194412
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194412
Log:
PR bootstrap/54926
* Makefile.am (AM_CFLAGS): Remove -frandom-seed=$@.
* configure.ac: If --with-target-subdir, add -frandom-seed=$@
to EXTRA_FLAGS unconditionally, otherwise check whether the compiler
accepts it.
* Makefile.in: Regenerated.
* configure: Regenerated.
Modified:
trunk/libbacktrace/ChangeLog
trunk/libbacktrace/Makefile.am
trunk/libbacktrace/Makefile.in
trunk/libbacktrace/configure
trunk/libbacktrace/configure.ac
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/54926] [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failure for various files in libbacktrace
2012-10-14 22:17 [Bug bootstrap/54926] New: [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failure for various files in libbacktrace danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2012-12-11 18:46 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-12-21 12:15 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-12-21 12:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54926
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
--- Comment #14 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-12-21 12:15:14 UTC ---
I suppose the bootstrap miscompare is fixed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread