From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19849 invoked by alias); 18 Oct 2012 09:44:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 19770 invoked by uid 48); 18 Oct 2012 09:43:47 -0000 From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug lto/54966] Does LTO requires a larger inline-unit-growth? Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 09:44:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: lto X-Bugzilla-Keywords: lto X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Keywords CC Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-10/txt/msg01643.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54966 Richard Biener changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |lto CC| |hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org, | |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener 2012-10-18 09:43:45 UTC --- I'm not sure how we count the initial unit size, given that when not using LTO not merged comdats are probably counted here, so overall they add up while the initial LTO unit size may be considerably smaller than the sum of the non-LTO unit sizes. Honza?