From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19204 invoked by alias); 28 Nov 2012 00:13:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 19151 invoked by uid 48); 28 Nov 2012 00:13:01 -0000 From: "hp at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/55001] Handle VEC_COND_EXPR better in tree-vect-generic.c Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 00:13:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: hp at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-11/txt/msg02615.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55001 --- Comment #6 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2012-11-28 00:13:00 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > > Can this be considered fixed? > Not completely. It doesn't fail anymore (so I marked PR55167 as fixed), > Now if you prefer, I could open another bug for this enhancement and we could > close this one. Sorry, no, I was actually mixing those PR's up, following up on a note I had for the other PR. Thanks for staying on it.