From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31756 invoked by alias); 22 Oct 2012 16:39:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 30583 invoked by uid 48); 22 Oct 2012 16:38:50 -0000 From: "mans at mansr dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/55026] New: [Multiple targets] Inefficient code with structs passed by value Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 16:39:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: mans at mansr dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-10/txt/msg01988.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55026 Bug #: 55026 Summary: [Multiple targets] Inefficient code with structs passed by value Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: mans@mansr.com Multiple targets (including ARM, HPPA, and MIPS) generate inefficient code in functions taking struct arguments by value. Consider this code: struct foo { int a; int b; }; int f(struct foo x) { return x.a + x.b; } On ARM, this compiles to the following at -O3 optimisation: f: @ args = 0, pretend = 0, frame = 8 @ frame_needed = 0, uses_anonymous_args = 0 @ link register save eliminated. sub sp, sp, #8 add r3, sp, #8 stmdb r3, {r0, r1} ldmia sp, {r0, r3} add r0, r0, r3 add sp, sp, #8 @ sp needed bx lr Note the entirely unnecessary (and inefficiently done to boot) storing and loading of the argument registers to/from the stack. The x86_64 and SH4 targets do not show this behaviour.