From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20588 invoked by alias); 15 Nov 2012 10:57:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 19419 invoked by uid 55); 15 Nov 2012 10:56:55 -0000 From: "hubicka at ucw dot cz" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug bootstrap/55051] [4.8 Regression] profiledbootstrap failed Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 10:57:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: bootstrap X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: hubicka at ucw dot cz X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.8.0 X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-11/txt/msg01389.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55051 --- Comment #24 from Jan Hubicka 2012-11-15 10:56:53 UTC --- > Note though that this is not an assert. It just emits a message to > stderr. Do you think a better error message is appropriate? I'm not > sure the "some data files may have been removed" is an accurate > description of the issue. Perhaps something like "Profile data file > mismatch may indicate corrupt profile data"? Well, we should figure out why sum_all starts to diverge. If we had problems mixing cc1 and cc1plus executions, we should get mismatches in number of counters. What happens after the miscompare? Honza