public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "hubicka at ucw dot cz" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug bootstrap/55051] [4.8 Regression] profiledbootstrap failed
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 18:57:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-55051-4-mRIDB5PZIz@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-55051-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55051
--- Comment #29 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at ucw dot cz> 2012-11-16 18:57:41 UTC ---
>
> I'm confused - that is essentially what it is doing today (although
> comparing against the first merged file instead of the last merged
> file). It isn't expecting all the gcda files to have the same number
> of runs, but when they do it expects them to have the same sum_all.
> See the trace of updates I show below this pseudo code in the same
> email that shows why that is not working.
Hmm, after some tought I guess what can happen is that number of run matches
but these are different run, because more than 2 streamings may be running...
Honza
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-16 18:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-24 10:22 [Bug bootstrap/55051] New: " hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2012-10-24 10:22 ` [Bug bootstrap/55051] " hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2012-10-24 23:50 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2012-10-25 0:49 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2012-10-25 6:52 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2012-11-14 15:07 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2012-11-14 15:09 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2012-11-14 15:13 ` markus at trippelsdorf dot de
2012-11-14 15:35 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz
2012-11-14 20:48 ` markus at trippelsdorf dot de
2012-11-14 23:03 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-11-15 0:07 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-11-15 0:22 ` tejohnson at google dot com
2012-11-15 0:31 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2012-11-15 1:03 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-11-15 1:07 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-11-15 1:10 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-11-15 1:18 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-11-15 1:29 ` tejohnson at google dot com
2012-11-15 1:34 ` tejohnson at google dot com
2012-11-15 1:42 ` Jan Hubicka
2012-11-15 1:43 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz
2012-11-15 1:53 ` tejohnson at google dot com
2012-11-15 2:02 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz
2012-11-15 2:46 ` tejohnson at google dot com
2012-11-15 6:44 ` tejohnson at google dot com
2012-11-15 10:56 ` Jan Hubicka
2012-11-15 10:57 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz
2012-11-15 14:34 ` tejohnson at google dot com
2012-11-15 22:42 ` tejohnson at google dot com
2012-11-16 17:42 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-11-16 18:03 ` tejohnson at google dot com
2012-11-16 18:57 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz [this message]
2012-11-19 5:21 ` tejohnson at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-12-07 12:04 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-55051-4-mRIDB5PZIz@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).