From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-406594-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 19916 invoked by alias); 14 Nov 2012 15:13:26 -0000
Received: (qmail 19848 invoked by uid 48); 14 Nov 2012 15:13:10 -0000
From: "markus at trippelsdorf dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug bootstrap/55051] [4.8 Regression] profiledbootstrap failed
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 15:13:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: bootstrap
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: markus at trippelsdorf dot de
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.8.0
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: CC
Message-ID: <bug-55051-4-qV9FtEO9d5@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-55051-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-55051-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-11/txt/msg01256.txt.bz2


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55051

Markus Trippelsdorf <markus at trippelsdorf dot de> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |markus at trippelsdorf dot
                   |                            |de

--- Comment #6 from Markus Trippelsdorf <markus at trippelsdorf dot de> 2012-11-14 15:13:08 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> There are
> 
>       badness = (relative_time_benefit (callee_info, edge, edge_time)
>                  * (INT_MIN / 16 / RELATIVE_TIME_BENEFIT_RANGE));
>       badness /= (growth * MAX (1, callee_info->growth));
>       gcc_checking_assert (badness <=0 && badness >= INT_MIN / 16);

Yes, badness is 1 in this case...
I'm reducing the issue right now.