public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "tejohnson at google dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug bootstrap/55051] [4.8 Regression] profiledbootstrap failed
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 18:03:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-55051-4-xT7v7Lc3fe@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-55051-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55051

--- Comment #28 from Teresa Johnson <tejohnson at google dot com> 2012-11-16 18:03:08 UTC ---
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 9:42 AM, hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
<gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55051
>
> --- Comment #27 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-11-16 17:42:26 UTC ---
>   /* Now merge each file.  */
>   for (gi_ptr = gcov_list; gi_ptr; gi_ptr = gi_ptr->next)
>     {
>         // Open existing gcda file for gi_ptr
>         // Find program summary corresponding to this executable -> save in prg
>         // Merge execution counts for each function
>         // Merge program summary
>         //      - If this is the first merged file for this execution,
> save merged summary in all_prg
>         //      - Otherwise if #runs the same in prg and all_prg,
> print error message if prg != all_prg.
>         // Write merged gcda
>     }
>
> Hmm, yes, it seems wrong.  We can not expect all gcda files to have same number
> of runs.  We really need to process sum_all & friends locally for each file.
> Only I suppose we can check if number of runs of the prg happens to match the
> last merged file then sum_all should match.

I'm confused - that is essentially what it is doing today (although
comparing against the first merged file instead of the last merged
file). It isn't expecting all the gcda files to have the same number
of runs, but when they do it expects them to have the same sum_all.
See the trace of updates I show below this pseudo code in the same
email that shows why that is not working.

> That would be nice consistency
> check. If the bootstrap works with this change, consider the patch preapproved.

I had sent a patch last night to simply rip out this check based on
the analysis I had done, but I assume you are not talking about that.

Thanks,
Teresa

>
> --
> Configure bugmail: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You are on the CC list for the bug.



--
Teresa Johnson | Software Engineer | tejohnson@google.com | 408-460-2413


  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-11-16 18:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-10-24 10:22 [Bug bootstrap/55051] New: " hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2012-10-24 10:22 ` [Bug bootstrap/55051] " hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2012-10-24 23:50 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2012-10-25  0:49 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2012-10-25  6:52 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2012-11-14 15:07 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2012-11-14 15:09 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2012-11-14 15:13 ` markus at trippelsdorf dot de
2012-11-14 15:35 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz
2012-11-14 20:48 ` markus at trippelsdorf dot de
2012-11-14 23:03 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-11-15  0:07 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-11-15  0:22 ` tejohnson at google dot com
2012-11-15  0:31 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2012-11-15  1:03 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-11-15  1:07 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-11-15  1:10 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-11-15  1:18 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-11-15  1:29 ` tejohnson at google dot com
2012-11-15  1:34 ` tejohnson at google dot com
2012-11-15  1:42   ` Jan Hubicka
2012-11-15  1:43 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz
2012-11-15  1:53 ` tejohnson at google dot com
2012-11-15  2:02 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz
2012-11-15  2:46 ` tejohnson at google dot com
2012-11-15  6:44 ` tejohnson at google dot com
2012-11-15 10:56   ` Jan Hubicka
2012-11-15 10:57 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz
2012-11-15 14:34 ` tejohnson at google dot com
2012-11-15 22:42 ` tejohnson at google dot com
2012-11-16 17:42 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-11-16 18:03 ` tejohnson at google dot com [this message]
2012-11-16 18:57 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz
2012-11-19  5:21 ` tejohnson at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-12-07 12:04 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-55051-4-xT7v7Lc3fe@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).