From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2080 invoked by alias); 15 Dec 2012 16:05:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 1953 invoked by uid 48); 15 Dec 2012 16:05:37 -0000 From: "janus at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/55072] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Missing internal_pack leads to wrong code with derived type Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 16:05:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: janus at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.6.4 X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-12/txt/msg01565.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55072 --- Comment #12 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-15 16:05:36 UTC --- (In reply to comment #11) > Note: This still shows scan-tree-dump failures on assumed_type_2.f90, but now > only 2 of them at -O0 (instead of 4): > > FAIL: gfortran.dg/assumed_type_2.f90 -O0 scan-tree-dump-times original > "sub_array_assumed \\(D" 2 > FAIL: gfortran.dg/assumed_type_2.f90 -O0 scan-tree-dump-times original > "sub_array_assumed \\(\\(struct t3.0:. .\\) array_t3_ptr.data\\);" 1 > > Will do another full regtest ... Ok, I have verified that those two are indeed the only testsuite failures of the patch in comment #11.