From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21764 invoked by alias); 10 Dec 2012 13:50:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 21621 invoked by uid 48); 10 Dec 2012 13:50:23 -0000 From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/55079] [4.8 regression] false positive -Warray-bounds (also seen at -O3 bootstrap) Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 13:50:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.8.0 X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-12/txt/msg00987.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55079 --- Comment #12 from Richard Biener 2012-12-10 13:50:15 UTC --- For the testcase in comment#1 we have Found new range for len_10: [1, 7] Visiting statement: len_17 = MIN_EXPR ; Found new range for len_17: [0, +INF] which should have been [0, 7] I think. That fixes the testcase from comment#1.