public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/55079] [4.8 regression] false positive -Warray-bounds
Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2012 18:45:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-55079-4-xU7TCAf0UZ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-55079-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55079

--- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-11-02 18:44:37 UTC ---
Hmm, it seems to be due to off-by-one bug in my patch
Index: tree-ssa-loop-ivcanon.c
===================================================================
--- tree-ssa-loop-ivcanon.c     (revision 193098)
+++ tree-ssa-loop-ivcanon.c     (working copy)
@@ -405,11 +405,11 @@ remove_exits_and_undefined_stmts (struct
         into unreachable (or trap when debugging experience is supposed
         to be good).  */
       if (!elt->is_exit
-         && elt->bound.ult (double_int::from_uhwi (npeeled)))
+         && elt->bound.ule (double_int::from_uhwi (npeeled)))
        {
          gimple_stmt_iterator gsi = gsi_for_stmt (elt->stmt);
          gimple stmt = gimple_build_call
              (builtin_decl_implicit (BUILT_IN_UNREACHABLE), 0);

          gimple_set_location (stmt, gimple_location (elt->stmt));
          gsi_insert_before (&gsi, stmt, GSI_NEW_STMT);

I however introduced it because w/o it we get bootstrap miscompare. Looks like
I will need to debug it after all :(


  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-11-02 18:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-10-26  9:56 [Bug tree-optimization/55079] New: [4.8 regeression] " dimhen at gmail dot com
2012-10-26 10:09 ` [Bug tree-optimization/55079] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-10-30  9:34 ` [Bug tree-optimization/55079] [4.8 regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-10-30  9:35 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-11-02 16:35 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-11-02 16:47 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-11-02 18:45 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2012-11-02 20:51 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-11-14 19:31 ` [Bug tree-optimization/55079] [4.8 regression] false positive -Warray-bounds (also seen at -O3 bootstrap) hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-11-15  1:01 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-12-07 12:55 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-12-10 13:23 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-12-10 13:50 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-12-10 14:14 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-12-10 16:27 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz
2012-12-11 10:06 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-12-11 10:08 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-12-12  9:33 ` schwab at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-55079-4-xU7TCAf0UZ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).