public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/55081] [4.8 regression?] Non-optimized static array elements initialization
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 14:49:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-55081-4-EXEm8eL8Hf@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-55081-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55081

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
                   |                            |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.8.0

--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-10-26 14:49:20 UTC ---
Works fine with -std=c++11.
In store_init we have:
  /* In C++0x constant expression is a semantic, not syntactic, property.
     In C++98, make sure that what we thought was a constant expression at
     template definition time is still constant.  */
  if ((cxx_dialect >= cxx0x
       || DECL_INITIALIZED_BY_CONSTANT_EXPRESSION_P (decl))
      && (decl_maybe_constant_var_p (decl)
          || TREE_STATIC (decl)))

but here DECL_INITIALIZED_BY_CONSTANT_EXPRESSION_P (decl) isn't set and
cxx_dialect < cxx0x for -std=c++98.  Not sure what we should do here, either
just call maybe_constant_value or maybe_constant_init otherwise to fold sizeof,
or, if it is really not appropriate for C++98 as an optimization,
fold_sizeof_expr_r recursively plus fold.  Jason, what do you think?


  reply	other threads:[~2012-10-26 14:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-10-26 13:14 [Bug c++/55081] New: " zhroma at ispras dot ru
2012-10-26 14:49 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2012-10-26 15:17 ` [Bug c++/55081] " amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-10-26 15:34 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-10-26 15:59 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-10-26 20:30 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-10-26 20:32 ` [Bug c++/55081] [4.8 Regression] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-55081-4-EXEm8eL8Hf@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).